SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 469

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Vishal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Satyam Agrawal with Deepak Sahu for applicant; Gaurav Tiwari, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This first bail application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.216/2020, registered at Police Station Parvati District Sehore, for the offence punishable under section 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of IPC and section 5/6, 16/17 of POCSO Act. Applicant is in arrest since 15.1.2021.

2. Counsel for the applicant submits that in view of the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under section 164 of CrPC she has very categorically stated that she had gone with the applicant voluntarily, got married with him and he made physical relation with her consent. He further submits that as per the case of prosecution at the time of the incident, the age of the prosecutrix was 16 years and one month and as such considering the Exception 2 of section 375 of IPC sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, not being under 15 years of age, is not rape. He submits that considering the said explanation and the case of the prosecution as prosecutrix herself has admitted that she got married with the applicant and was aged about 16 years one month, no case of rape is made out and the applicant is accordingly

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top