SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 421

VISHAL DHAGAT
Mohbe Infrastructure (M/s. ) A Partnership Firm – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Sankalp Kochar for Petitioner;
Anuj Shrivastava, Panel Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging order dated 25.11.2020 contained in Annexure-P/15.

2. It is submitted by counsel appearing for petitioner that petitioner is a partnership firm which had purchased land bearing Khasra No.102/1 and Khasra No.102/2, admeasuring total 1.475 hectares. Petitioner firm developed Real Estate Project 'Betul Pride' on a part of said land. All requisite permissions were obtained. It is submitted that subsequent purchasers were Scheduled Castes and were granted approval in legal search report of Canara Bank. Respondent No.3 i.e. State Bank of India expressed inability to sanction loan on the project as land which is sought to be mortgaged belongs to purchaser who is from Scheduled Tribe category. Bank expressed that permission of Collector was required under relevant provisions of M.P. Land Revenue Code. When subsequent purchaser approached Collector for getting permission under section 165(6) of M.P. Land Revenue Code, the same was rejected on the ground that there is ban on transfer including creation of mortgage. It is submitted that Collector ignored the recommendation of S.D.O. as well as Patwari to grant permission.

3. Pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top