SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 472

MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Janki Bai – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vibhor Kumar Sahu for petitioners; Sohit Mishra, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The present petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is preferred being aggrieved by the action on the part of the respondent authorities in recording the land bearing Survey No.1/19 Min 1 Rakba 0.585 hectares situated at Village Ari Tehsil and District Guna in Column No.12 as 'non-transferable' though the said land is of the ownership of the petitioners.

2. The aforesaid action has been assailed on the ground that the said entry was made in the revenue records without there being any specific order and even though it didn't belonged to any of the categories of non- transferable lands.

3. Short facts of the case are that in the year 1961, a lease was granted to one Gopi Lal S/o Chhutti Lal Lodha vide order dated 6.2.1961 in Case No.188/161-162, admeasuring 10 Bighas from Aaraji No.1 situated at Village Ari Tehsil and District Guna. In the Khasra Panchshala of the Samvat 2034-2038, the entry with regard to Survey No.1/19 was made against the name of Gopi Lal and later the name of Gangaram/predecessor of present petitioners was mutated by mutation No.19 dated 25.9.1980 for the land bearing survey No.1/19 Min 1 Rakba 0.585 hectare in Column No.12. Since thereaft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top