SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 876

ASHISH SHROTI
Ms Sanober Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Akshat Kumar Jain for petitioner; Man Singh Jadon, Government Advocate, for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed this petition challenging the order, dated 7.6.2022, (Annexure P/1) whereby her claim for grant of family pension has been declined by the respondent-District Pension Officer, Shivpuri.

2. The facts necessary for decision of this case are that the petitioner's father late Shri Israr Ahmed Khan was working as Hostel Superintendent at P.T.I., Industrial Training Institute, Shivpuri. He retired from service w.e.f. 31.10.1999 and was availing benefit of regular pension from the State Government till he expired on 3.12.2019. The petitioner's mother predeceased her father on 21.1.2016.

3. The petitioner submitted her claim for family pension before the respondents. The claim was rejected on the ground that she has crossed the age of 25 years and as per rule 47 of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) rules, 1976, an unmarried daughter above 25 years of age is not entitled to family pension. The petitioner, thereafter, made another application on 13.5.2022 (Annexure P/6) stating therein that she has undergone three major open heart surgeries for ASD, Valve replacement and Removal of Aortic Ridges. It was also stated that she has undergone one spine surgery and a pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top