SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 938

ALOK AWASTHI
Kantilal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Akhil Godha for petitioner; Anand Bhatt, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the order dated 13.11.2025 passed by the 2nd District Judge, Shajapur in MCA.No.23 of 2025 whereby the appeal filed by the respondents has been allowed and the application under Order 39 rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the CPC filed by the petitioners / plaintiffs has been dismissed and the order dated 8.10.2024 passed in RCS-A 126/2024 by the 2nd Civil Judge, Jr. Division, District - Shajapur has been set aside.

2. Facts of the case are that the petitioners have filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant respondents stating that land bearing survey No.1462 Rakba 0.094 and No. 1464 Rakba 0.10 hectare situated at Nagar Maksi, Tehsil and District Shajapur is of the ownership and possession of the petitioners and also recorded in the revenue record and the same is the suit property. It was further stated that the petitioners are doing the agricultural operation since the time of their forefather and the same allotted to them by the Jagri of the Gwalior States and from the last 4-5 generations they are in the possession of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top