Back
S.P.KHARE
Bhailal – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kumar – Respondent
This is a revision by the plaintiffs against the order by which the appeal of the defendants under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) CPC has been allowed and the order of temporary injunction issued by the trial Court in favour of the plaintiffs has been vacated.
It is not in dispute that the lands in dispute Khasra No. 308 and 309 of village Bhatigawan, Tahsil Maihar were the ancestral property of two brothers Sudarshan and Sarman. The plaintiffs are heirs of Sudarshan and the defendants No.1 and 2 are sons of Sarman. There had been pm1ition between the two brothers about 50 years ago and the lands in dispute were allotted to the share of Sudarshan. In the revenue papers the lands continued to be recorded in the names of both the brothers.
The plaintiffs' case is that in the partition the lands in dispute were allotted to the share of Sudarshan and these were in his possession and after his death these came in possession of his son Ramkripal. He gave these lands on adhia to the defendants No. 1 and 2 for sometime. That arrangement came to an end and the plaintiffs themselves sowed soyabin crop on these lands in July, 1997. It is alleged that these defendants got the regis
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
