SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 548

CHANDRESH BHUSHAN
Bajranglal Verma – Appellant
Versus
Gyaso Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
A.M. Naik with B.K. Agarwal for appellant; Sanjeev Jain for respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by a decree and judgment dated 25.6.2001 pronounced by 9th Additional District Judge, Gwalior for his eviction on the ground under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 12 of M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961, i.e., on the ground of denial of title in favour of the respondent No.1, in an appeal preferred by the said respondent No.1 against judgment and decree dated 11.12.2000 of 10th Civil Judge Class-2, Gwalior dismissing her suit for eviction and arrears of rent, this second appeal has been preferred by the appellant-tenant.

The undisputed facts of the case are that the appellant was a tenant in a portion of a house bearing Municipal No. 30/1608/1 (hereinafter referred as 'Suit Premises'). The appellant was inducted as a tenant in it by one Manorama Devi Falke who died issueless. Ramchandra Rao and Man Singh Rao were the sons of her only sister. No notice of any kind of transfer by Ram Chandra Rao etc. or by the respondents was ever given to the appellant.

One Smt. Gyaso Bai, now deceased, had submitted an application under section 23 of M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961, in respect to the suit premises before the Rent Controlling Authority



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top