SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 1246

S.A.NAQVI
Deewan Singh Rajput – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Aniket Saxena for appellant; M.P.S. Bhadoriya, public prosecutor for State.

JUDGMENT

1. Appellant Deewan Singh Rajput has preferred this appeal aggrieved by impugned judgment dated 1st February 2000 passed by Special Judge, Shivpuri (Atrocities) in Special Case No. 39/98 whereby appellant has been convicted under section 456 of IPC and under section 3 (1) (XI) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and sentenced to undergo 6 months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default 3 months rigorous imprisonment and 6 months rigorous imprisonment, fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default 3 months rigorous imprisonment respectively.

2. Prosecution case in brief is that complainant Bhatobai belongs to scheduled caste. Appellant Deewan Singh belongs to a caste other than scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. On 16.2.1998 at about 10 p.m. appellant entered in the house of complainant and outraged her modesty using criminal force with ulterior motive. On making alarm by complainant Bhatobai, appellant ran away leaving behind his clothes. FIR (Ex. P-2) has been lodged. Statement of witnesses have been recorded under section 161 of CrPC. Spot map (Ex. P-3) has been prepared and the appellant has been arrested.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top