SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 511

B.M.GUPTA
S. S. Trivedi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Gupta for applicant; J.M. Sahani for State; J.P. Mishra and Nitin Mishra for respondent No. 2.

ORDER

1. The instant petition is for impugning the order dated 30th August, 2006 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhander in Criminal Case No. 74/04, whereby the learned Magistrate, while rejecting the ground taken on behalf of the petitioner under section 197 of CrPC, has ordered to frame a charge against him for the offence punishable under section 420, 467, 468, 120B of IPC.

2. Shri Gupta, the learned counsel for petitioner, has assailed the impugned order on two grounds :

1. That, section 3 of Judges (Protection) Act; 1985, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) no civil or criminal proceeding can be initiated against the petitioner because he was functioning as Judge, while passing the impugned order dated 2.9.1996.

2. That, the alleged act has been done by the petitioner in the capacity of his being a public servant, hence without prior sanction of section 197 CrPC, cognizance cannot be taken against him. In support, he has drawn attention on an order of this Court passed in Balram Bar Prasad Choubey and another v. Aswani Kumar Yadav and another [2001 (II) MPWN 154 = 2001 (3) MPLJ 363].

3. Shri Sahani, the learned counsel for State has submitted that vide order dated 19th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top