SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 867

P.K.JAISWAL
Mamta Bharadwaj – Appellant
Versus
Madhusudan Bharadwaj – Respondent


Advocates:
Smt. Sudha Dvivedi for petitioner; Prashant Sharma for respondent.

ORDER

1. Heard.

This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner/non-applicant against the order dated 5.4.2008 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Gwalior, in Suit No. 117-Al07 (HMA), whereby the learned Family Court rejected the application for grant of maintenance pendente lite filed by the petitioner under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short the "Act") and awarded Rs. 1,500/- only towards litigation expenses.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent-husband has filed an application under section 13 of the Act for dissolution of marriage solemnized between the petitioner-wife and respondent-husband. The· proceedings have been registered as Case No. 117 -Al07 (HMA) and is pending before the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Gwalior. In the said proceedings, petitioner-wife filed an application under section. 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking maintenance pendente lite and expenses for the proceedings. The respondent-husband is working at SRF Malanpur and his monthly income is Rs. 10,562/-. He is having agricultural land at Village Chhareta, from which his income is Rs. 3










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top