SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 54

RAJENDRA MENON
Ashok Singh Pal – Appellant
Versus
Manjulata – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K. Sharma for petitioner; Sarvesh Chouhan for respondent.

ORDER

1. Challenging the order dated 10.10.2007 Annexure P-1 passed by the Principle Judge, Family Court, Gwalior in Case No. 531-Al06 (Hindu Marriage Act) rejecting an application for adjustment of interim alimony granted in the proceedings held in the case in question i.e. Case No. 531-A/06 pending under the Hindu Marriage Act, petitioner has filed this petition.

2. Facts in brief necessary for disposal of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution are that petitioner/husband has filed an application under section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of the marriage solemnized between the petitioner/husband and respondent wife. The proceedings have been registered as case No. 531-A/06 (HMA) and is pending before the Presiding Judge, Family Court, Gwalior. In the said proceedings, respondent/wife filed an application under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking maintenance pendente lite and expenses for the proceedings. In the application filed under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act respondent/wife claimed a sum of Rs. 2,000/per month as maintenance, a sum of Rs. 500/- as litigation expenses. It was her case that petitioner/husband is earning more than R











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top