INDRANI DATTA, SUBHASH SAMVATSAR
Ram Babu Vaishya (d) through LRs – Appellant
Versus
Scindia Kanya Vidyalaya – Respondent
Samvatsar, J. -- 1. This first appeal is filed by defendants No.1 and 2 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20th December, 2005 delivered by Special Judge (Atrocities) and First Additional District Judge to the Court of District Judge, Gwalior in Civil Suit No.22-A/03 by which the learned trial Court has decreed the suit filed by plaintiff respondent No.1 Scindiya Kanya Vidyalaya Society for declaration of title and injunction.
2. Facts of the case, briefly stated, are that the plaintiff Scindiya Kanya Vidyalaya society is a society registered under the United State of Gwalior, Indore and Malwa (Madhya Bharat) Societies Act, 1950 having its registration at No.306/56 dated 1.8.1956 having its registered office at Motimahal Road, Gwalior. Said society is imparting education to the students upto 12th standard and nearly 750 students are studying in the said institution.
3. Present suit is filed by one Shrimati Suniti Sharma on behalf of the said society, being Secretary to the society and the Principal of the said school. A resolution authorising Shrimati Suniti Sharma to file suit was passed by the governing body of the society on 6.3.2002.
4. As per the plaint
7. Collector of Bombay v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay = [AIR 1951 SC 469]
1. Abdul Jabbar v. Venkata Sastri = [AIR 1969 SC 1147]
8. Smt. Bhanumati Chauhan v. Chetan Singh and others = [AIR 1997 HP 48]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.