SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 378

B.M.GUPTA
Madhusudan Bharadwaj – Appellant
Versus
Mamta Bharadwaj – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma for petitioners;
Vishal Mishra with Smt. Sudha Dwivedi for respondent.

ORDER

1. Feeling aggrieved with an order dated 6.9.2007 passed by 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No. 164/07, this revision has been preferred by all the three petitioners. Vide impugned order, the learned Judge has affirmed an order dated 9.7.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gwalior in Criminal Case No.5279/ 2007, whereby the learned Magistrate has partly allowed an application under section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") filed by respondent-Mamta Bharadwaj, the wife of the petitioner No.l-Madhusudan Bharadwaj and has (1) restrained the petitioners not to create any domestic violence with the respondent, (2) directed the petitioners to permit the respondent to share her residence in family house or in alternate, petitioner No.1 to arrange suitable house of the same status for her, (3) directed the petitioners to execute their bonds of Rs. l0,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) each for a condition not to create domestic violence with the respondent, and (4) directed the petitioners to pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation to the respondent in lieu of the cruelty played by them o






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top