SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 474

P.K.JAISWAL
Neelam Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates:
Mrigendra Singh for appellant.

JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short "the Act"), challenging the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2006, allowing the petition of the respondent under section 13 of the Act, and granting him a decree for divorce against the appellant-wife.

2. Undisputedly the appellant was married to the respondent-husband on 22.4.2004 in accoreance with Hindu rites at village Dhaba Goutman Tola of Distrit Rewa. After marriage she had gone to her in-laws place and stayed with them for a period of 8-10 days and thereafter she came to her parents' place at village Dhaba Goutman Tola. According to respondent, after marriage though he lived with his wife, but he had no physical relation with his wife. The appellant-Neelam was having illicit relations with Anurag Mishra and when she was residing at her parents' place, she with her consent had gone to Surat with Anurag Mishra on 12.9.2005 and she stayed with him for a period of more than one month at Surat in one room and during this period she had physical relations with him. Thus, she had extra-marital relations with one Anugram Mishra to whom she knew prior to her marriage and, therefore, he prayed tha


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top