R.K.GUPTA, DIPAK MISRA
Shyama Charan Paul – Appellant
Versus
Roopali Promoters and Construction – Respondent
Misra, J.--l. In this intra-Court appeal, the challenge is to the order dated 12.9.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 14545/2007.
2. The appellants as petitioners invoked the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India calling in question the legal validity of the order dated 25.8.2007 passed by the learned Second Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No. 16453/2007. The learned Single Judge has concurred with the conclusion recorded by the Trial Judge whereby he had held that the appellants as plaintiffs were required to affix the ad valorem court fee for declaring the sale deed dated 11.5.2004 registered on 12.5.2004/14.5.2004 as null and void.
3. We have heard Mr. Shripal Jain, learned counsel for the appellants, on the question of admission. It is submitted by Mr. Jain that the plaintiffs were trying to avoid the sale-deed and, therefore, they are only required to pay the fixed court fee.
4. On a perusal of the order passed by the learned Single Judge, it is perceivable that he has referred to the relief clause of the civil Suit which clearly mentions for declaring the document executed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.