SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 974

R.S.JHA
Gyanendra @ Chotu – Appellant
Versus
Anoop Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
A.P. Singh for petitioner;
Samdarshi Tiwari, Government Advocate for State;
D.S. Thakur for respondent No.1

ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by order dated 22.11.2007 passed by the Election Tribunal/Sub-Divisional Officer, Kherlanji in an election petition filed by the respondent No.1 against the election of the petitioner as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Amai, Tehsil Kherlanji, District Balaghat.

2. The brieffacts leading to filing of the petition are that the petitioner, the respondent No.1 and other candidates participated in the elections held for the post of Sarpanch, Gram Pane hay at, Amai, Tahsil Kherlanji, District Balaghat held on 23.1.2005 and the petitioner was declared elected having secured 433 votes as against the respondent No.1 who secured 430 votes. Being aggrieved by the election of the petitioner, the respondent No.1 filed an election petition before the Election Tribunal/Sub-Divisional Officer, Kherlanji under section 122 of the M.P. Gram Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 read with the provisions of the M.P. Panchayat (Election Petition Corn.1pt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995. The Sub-Divisional Officer by the impugned order dated 22.11.2007 has ordered recount by allowing the petition be
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top