SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1187

S. B. SINHA, A. R. LAKSHMANAN, V. N. KHARE
M. Chinnasamy – Appellant
Versus
K. C. Palanisamy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha for himself and CJI.-To what extent an election tribunal should exercise its jurisdiction to direct inspection of the ballot papers and recounting of votes polled while determining an election petition in terms of the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act , for the sake of brevity) is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 07.11.2002 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Election Petition No. 7 of 2000.

Background facts :

2. An election took place for Karur Parliamentary Constituency (26) consisting of six assembly segments on 05.09.1999. Eleven candidates contested the said election. Total number of votes polled was 719705 and the appellant herein who is the returned candidate having the election symbol of two leaves secured 334407 votes whereas Respondent No. 1 herein (the election petitioner) who contested the said election on the election symbol of rising sun secured 331560 votes. The margin of votes between the returned candidate and the election petitioner was, thus, 2847.

3. It is also not in dispute that 16906 votes were rejected. The chief election a








































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top