Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Prakash Shrivastava, J.
Badrilal and others v. State of M.P. and others
Writ Petition No.10072 of 2012 (Indore); Decided on 14.5.2013.
Held : In view of the aforesaid analysis, it is held that the petitioners who were not holding the requisite qualification which have been prescribed in the Rules, have rightly been found ineligible for appointment to the post in question. (2003)3 SCC 541 and (2003)3 SCC 548 followed. Writ Petition No.4529 of 2013, Writ Petition No.6559 of 2013 and Writ Petition No.6686 of 2013 relied on.
iapk;r jkt ,oa xzke Lojkt vf/kfu;e] 1993 ¼e-iz-½ & /kkjk 95¼1½ lgifBr /kkjk 70¼2½ & e-iz- iapk;r lafonk ‘kkyk f’k{kd ¼fu;kstu ,oa lafonk dh ‘krsZ½ fu;e] 2005 & fu-6] vuqlwph 2 & lafonk f’k{kdksa dh fu;qfDr;k¡ & lacaf/kr fu;eksa ds vuqlkj dh tk,xh & p;u izfdz;k esa lfEefyr gksuk rFkk fyf[kr ijh{kk mRrh.kZ djus ek= ls visf{kr vgZrk u gksus dh vik=rk ij dksbZ izHkko ugha gksxkA vfHkfu/kkZfjr % iwoksZDr fo’ys”k.k dks n`f”Vxr j[krs gq,] ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;kphx.k] ftuds ikl fu;eksa esa fofgr dh xbZ visf{kr vgZrk ugha Fkh] iz’uxr in ij fu;qfDr ds fy, Bhd&gh vik= ik, x,A ¼2003½3 ,l lh lh 541 rFkk ¼2003½3 ,l lh lh 548 vuqlfjrA fjV ;kfpdk dz- 4529 lu~ 2013] fjV ;kfpdk dz- 6559 lu~ 2013 rFkk fjV ;kfpdk dz- 6686 lu~ 2013 voyafcrA
1. This order will govern the disposal of Writ Petitions No.10072/2012, 4126/2013, 3977/2013, 2528/2013, 2530/2013, 2645/2013, 2676/2013, 2758/2013, 2857/2013, 2896/2013, 2898/2013, 2899/2013, 2900/2013, 2901/2013, 2902/2013, 2926/2013, 2928/2013, 2929/2013, 2990/2013, 3200/2013, 3526/2013, 3260/2013, 3263/2013, 3267/2013, 3272/2013, 3274/2013, 3275/2013, 3276/2013, 3290/2013, 3410/2013, 3412/2013, 3623/2013, 3626/2013, 3629/2013, 3630/2013, 3680/2013, 3690/2013, 3699/2013, 3721/2013, 3731/2013, 3732/2013, 3733/2013, 3734/2013, 3735/2013, 3736/2013, 3737/2013, 3738/2013, 3739/2013, 3740/2013, 3741/2013, 3742/2013, 3743/2013, 3744/2013, 3745/2013, 3746/2013, 3747/2013, 3748/2013, 3925/2013, 3979/2013, 4001/2013, 4002/2013, 4018/2013, 4021/2013, 4023/2013, 4024/2013, 4031/2013, 4032/2013, 4040/2013, 4048/2013, 4049/2013, 4051/2013, 4052/2013, 4054/2013, 4055/2013, 4056/2013, 4059/2013, 4063/2013, 4070/2013, 4071/2013, 4072/2013, 4073/2013, 4074/2013, 4075/2013, 4077/2013, 4078/2013, 4079/2013, 4082/2013, 4083/2013, 4084/2013, 4085/2013, 4093/2013, 4099/2013, 4100/2013, 4102/2013, 4103/2013, 4106/2013, 4108/2013, 4110/2013, 4115/2013, 4116/2013, 4117/2013, 4118/2013, 4120/2013, 4122/2013, 4123/2013, 4124/2013, 4125/2013, 4127/2013, 4128/2013, 4129/2013, 4132/2013, 4134/2013, 4139/2013, 4141/2013, 4146/2013, 4147/2013, 4148/2013, 4149/2013, 4150/2013, 4151/2013, 4152/2013, 4153/2013, 4154/2013, 4155/2013, 4156/2013, 4157/2013, 4158/2013, 4159/2013, 4160/2013, 4161/2013, 4162/2013, 4163/2013, 4164/2013, 4172/2013, 4176/2013, 4179/2013, 4181/2013, 4188/2013, 4189/2013, 4190/2013, 4193/2013, 4196/2013, 4197/2013, 4198/2013, 4202/2013, 4206/2013, 4221/2013, 4227/2013, 4264/2013, 4265/2013, 4268/2013, 4307/2013, 4357/2013, 4386/2013, 4387/2013, 4388/2013, 4389/2013, 4398/2013, 4412/2013, 4433/2013, 4561/2013, 4572/2013, 4580/2013, 4277/2013, 3120/2013, 3321/2013, 3722/2013, 3723/2013, 3724/2013, 3725/2013, 3728/2013, 3729/2013, 3730/2013, 3753/2013, 3762/2013, 3796/2013, 3831/2013, 3832/2013, 3834/2013, 3835/2013, 3836/2013, 3837/2013, 3838/2013, 3919/2013, 3921/2013, 3922/2013, 3931/2013, 3933/2013, 3934/2013, 3935/2013, 3936/2013, 3947/2013, 3961/2013, 3962/2013, 3963/2013, 3964/2013, 3975/2013, 3976/2013, 3982/2013, 3984/2013, 3985/2013, 3987/2013, 3988/2013, 3989/2013, 3996/2013, 4236/2013, 4244/2013, 4270/2013, 4275/2013, 4290/2013, 4291/2013, 4292/2013, 4313/2013, 4356/2013, 4373/2013, 4446/2013, 4460/2013, 4461/2013, 4482/2013, 4487/2013, 4488/2013, 4489/2013, 4490/2013, 4491/2013, 4492/2013, 4493/2013, 4494/2013, 4495/2013, 4498/2013, 4499/2013, 4702/2013, 4703/2013, 4713/2013, 4719/2013, 4720/2013, 4658/2013, 4659/2013, 4660/2013, 4661/2013, 4662/2013, 4663/2013, 4664/2013, 4665/2013, 4666/2013, 4668/2013, 4679/2013, 4683/2013, 4691/2013, 4694/2013, 4698/2013, 4699/2013, 10040/2012, 5412/2013, 5431/2013, 5432/2013, 5559/2013, 5560/2013, 5561/2013, 5562/2013, 5925/2013, 5924/2013, 5873/2013, 5874/2013, 5875/2013, 5876/2013, 5878/2013, 5879/2013, 5880/2013, 5768/2013, 5872/2013, 5932/2013, 5796/2013, 3563/2013, 5794/2013, 5793/2013, 5956/2013, 6134/2013, 6135/2013, 6136/2013, 6006/2013, 6010/2013, 6007/2013, 5015/2013, 5013/2013, 5720/2013, 5717/2013, 5711/2013, 5708/2013, 5702/2013, 5662/2013, 5520/2013, 5525/2013, 5533/2013, 5430/2013, 4672/2013, 4500/2013, 5594/2013, 5595/2013, 5660/2013, 5009/2013, 4807/2013, 5735/2013 and 5795/2013. It is stated by the counsel for both the parties that all these writ petitions involve same issue on the similar fact situation.
1A. These writ petitions relate to the recruitment to the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade I, Grade II and Grade III (for short “Samvida Shala Shikshak”). Since respondents have not considered the petitioners for appointment to the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak on the ground that the petitioners do not possess the requisite minimum qualification prescribed for the post, therefore, the petitioners have approached this Court.
2. In brief, the advertisements were
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
