IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VISHAL DHAGAT, J.
Vishram - Applicant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MISC. Criminal Case No. 27835 of 2024
Decided On : 14-08-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application details. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. legal definition and application of ndps act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. ruling allowing bail application. (Para 7) |
| 5. conditions and order for bail. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER :
VISHAL DHAGAT, J.
This is fourth bail application filed by the applicant under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Surksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to applicant who is in custody since 18.3.2023 relating to FIR No.108/2023 registered at Police Station Khalwa, District Khandwa (M.P.) for the offences under Section 8 /18 of NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant was found to be cultivating opium plants. He has placed reliance on order dated 18.11.2022 passed by Indore Bench of this Court in MCrC No.29915/2022 ( Chhogalal vs. State of M.P. ). It is submitted that in respect of cultivation of opium poppy, small quantity and commercial quantity is not specified, therefore, bar under section 37 of NDPS Act will not be applicable. Case of applicant is covered by aforesaid order passed in the case of Chhogalal (supra). In these circumstances prayer is made for release of applicant on bail.
3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed the application for grant of bail. It is submitted that huge quantity of opium poppy have been seized from the applicant. Applicant was cultivating opium plants. Earlier bail application was dismissed on merits. No change in circumstances, therefore, application be dismissed.
4. Heard the counsel for the parties.
5. Opium poppy is described in Section 2(xvii)(a) as under:-
"Opium poppy" means:
(a) the plant of the species Papaver somniferum L; and
(b) the plant of any other species of Papaver from which opium or any phenanthrene alkaloid can be extracted and which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare to be opium poppy for the purposes of this Act."
6. From aforesaid definition it is clear that plant of the species Papaver somniferum L is covered by definition of Opium poppy. Opium plants which are seized by police will fall within definition of Opium poppy. As per section 18 of the Act, if contravention is in relation to cultivation of opium poppy of small quantity then penalty prescribed is R.I for a term of one year with fine. If contravention involves commercial quantity then penalty is not less than 10 years and fine and in other cases penalty prescribed is R.I upto 10 years. Notification is given in NDPS Act specifying small and commercial quantity. Entry 92, 93 and 110 is in respect of Opium. No entry is made in respect of Opium poppy. Commercial and small quantity is not prescribed in said table. Since small and commercial quantity is not prescribed for Opium poppy and cultivation of Opium plants is covered under Section 18 (c), therefore, Section 37 of NDPS Act will not be attracted in the case.
7. In view of aforesaid, bail application filed by applicant is allowed.
8. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his regular appearance before Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this regard during pendency of trial.
9. The applicant shall also abide by the following conditions of Section 480 (3) B.N.S.S. as under:-
(a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter;
(b) that such person shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected of the commission of which he is suspected and;
(c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
C.C. as p
The absence of specified small and commercial quantities for opium poppy cultivation under the NDPS Act means Section 37 does not apply, allowing for bail.
The court ruled that restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply when no defined quantity for commercial classification exists, allowing bail.
The court established that bail can be granted under Section 439 Cr.P.C. even in cases involving serious allegations under the NDPS Act, provided the circumstances warrant such a decision.
The court considered the lengthy trial process and absence of other pending cases in granting bail to the accused-petitioner for the offense under the NDPS act.
The court granted bail under the NDPS Act, finding no commercial quantity prescribed for cultivation and no risk of tampering with evidence.
The lack of minimum sentence prescribed under the NDPS Act and the turning hostile of seizure witnesses influenced the court's decision to grant bail to the applicant.
The court ruled that the absence of specified commercial quantity for poppy cultivation under the NDPS Act, combined with lack of evidence tampering risk, justifies granting bail.
The absence of a defined quantity for the cultivation of opium poppy under the NDPS Act allows for the granting of bail, as the restrictions of Section 37 do not apply in such cases.
The court determined that the restrictions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply when the offence does not involve commercial quantity or severe sections, allowing bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.