IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
VIVEK RUSIA, BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI, JJ.
Shravan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of M.P. Through Panchayat and Rural Development Department and others – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No. 12965 of 2020
Decided On : 19-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's arguments against gram panchayat's authority and procedures. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. construction legality maintained; public safety must be addressed. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. writ petition disposed with directions. (Para 20) |
ORDER :
Vivek Rusia, J.
The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to the respondents to stop the unauthorized construction of 11 shops being carried out without legal sanction and in violation of public safety norms on Nazul land (Survey No.144) on State Highway No. 39A at the congested intersection of Village –Bamniya.
FACTS OF THE CASE IN BRIEF
02. The petitioner is a permanent resident of Village – Bamniya, District – Jhabua, claiming himself to be a public-spirited individual working actively for public causes and identifies himself as an RTI activist also engaged in journalism with a reputed daily newspaper. Over the years, he has initiated several matters at the District and State level in Jhabua to expose corruption and to protect public interest. These included disclosure of financial losses to the Government, action against erring officials and successful prosecution of offenders and also matters that involve large-scale misappropriation of public funds.
2.1. According to the petitioner, at the intersection of Ratlam – Jhabua State Highway No.39A near the Ambika Mata Mandir in Village – Bamniya, there exists a sharp and narrow curve situated approximately 100 metres from the local railway station. The location is a busy junction where vehicular movement from Gujarat and Rajasthan converges with local and inter-district traffic, including heavy goods carriers transporting petroleum products, cement and chemicals. The petitioner avers that traffic congestion at this point is a daily occurrence lasting for extended periods, and the presence of the railway station nearby leads to a high volume of pedestrian traffic in the vicinity, aggravating the safety hazard.
2.3. The petitioner alleges that Survey No.144 of Village – Bamniya is a Government Nazul land adjoining the said intersection and despite repeated objections and in the absence of any lawful sanction, respondent No.5 / Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Village – Bamnia initiated construction of a commercial complex without any valid building permission, layout approval or No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the concerned departments.
2.4. The petitioner contended that the construction of 11 shops was allegedly permitted on the basis of a settlement proposal signed only by the Sarpanch and Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Bamniya without the approval or signatures of the elected Panchayat members and without any resolution passed by the Panchayat body. Accordingly to the petitioner, such construction on an already narrow stretch of a State Highway would inevitably cause complete obstruction of the road, severely impair pedestrian safety and jeopardize public life.
2.5. The petitioner avers that respondent No.5 had earlier submitted an application on 30.05.2013 seeking removal of encroachments from this junction, acknowledging the sensitivity of the area. A complaint was also filed by the petitioner through the Chief Minister Helpline, in response to which respondent No. 3 / Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Petlawad, Jhabua, addressed a communication to respondent No.5 vide letter dated 03.06.2015 stating that no sanctioned construction activity was permitted on the said road.
2.6. Thereafter, respondent No.5 again submitted a fresh application for construction of shops and approval of building layout which was duly rejected vide detailed order dated 16.04.2018 by respondent No.3 citing public safety concerns given the proximity of the location to a blind turn and the heavy vehicular traffic going through the route and further directed that existing shopkeepers creating congestion be relocated to an alternate
Unauthorized construction by a Gram Panchayat must comply with public safety norms and legal requirements, emphasizing that compliance is essential to prevent hazards.
Private land acquired through auction is outside the jurisdiction of local authorities for intervention, and expired permissions necessitate renewal for construction to proceed legally.
Authorities must respond timely to complaints regarding unauthorized constructions affecting public safety.
Court upheld a community sanitation complex project's legality over a land dispute, emphasizing public interest and rejecting the plaintiff's claims of obstruction.
The court emphasized local authorities' responsibility to investigate unauthorized construction and afforded procedural mechanisms for addressing public grievances without adjudicating the underlying....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.