Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Atul Sreedharan, Dinesh Kumar Paliwal
Adity Chakraverty – Appellant
Versus
Teevan Prasad Prajapati – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dinesh Kumar Paliwal, J.
This appeal under Section 28 of HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “HMA”) has been filed by the appellant challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 01.05.2023 passed by the First District Judge, Kotma, Anuppur (M.P.) in RCSHM No.87/2022 (Smt. Aditi Chakravarty Vs. Teevan Prasad Prajapati) whereby a decree of dissolution of marriage of the appellant with the respondent under Section 13-B(2) of HMA has been passed.
2. In short, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the marriage between the appellant and respondent was solemnized on 13.02.2019 according to Hindu rites and customs. They lived together as husband and wife and the marriage was consummated. The son Adhyan Prajapati was born on 20.01.2022. It is contended that when the appellant was carrying the pregnancy, respondent/husband deserted her and since 28.04.2021 she is living separately. On account of harassment, torture and humiliation by the respondent, appellant became mentally unsound and started to take treatment from Neuro Psychiatrist Dr. Sanjay Mishra since 03.10.2022. She was unable to understand her good and bad. It is further contended tha
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
