IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Vivek Rusia, Binod Kumar Dwivedi
Sudhir Jain – Appellant
Versus
Indore Municipal Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments concerning alternative remedies and prior ownership implications. (Para 1) |
| 2. ownership rights contested based on auction process and intended residential use. (Para 2) |
ORDER :
The petitioner has filed this present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashment of order dated 14.06.2022 whereby, the Indore Municipal Corporation has refused to grant building permission of Plot No.3 at Neelkanth Colony, Indore, admeasuring 1444 sq.ft. ("hereinafter referred to as "Plot No.3") on the ground that the subject plot is situated over the underground drainage.
2. Facts of the case, in short, are as under:-
2.1 The petitioner had purchased the aforesaid plot in an e-auction conducted by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Thereafter, a sale certificate dated 14.03.2022 was issued in favour of the petitioner. A registered sale deed dated 26.03.2022 conferred the title on the petitioner for which he incurred the expenses of Rs. 5,01,600/-.
2.2 The petitioner applied for permission to construct a house. The Indore Municipal Corporation has rejected the building permission on the ground that no construction is permissible within 9 meters of the plot bec

The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.