IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
VIVEK RUSIA, J.
M/S Kanhaiyalal And Company Through Its Proprietor Smt. Kiran Mundra, W/o. Shri Anand Swaroop Mundra – Petitioner
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through Its Managing Director and Anr. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 22645 of 2022
Decided On : 27-10-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of dealership and termination (Para 1) |
ORDER :
VIVEK RUSIA, J.
1. The petitioner, being a proprietorship firm represented through its proprietor Smt. Kiran Mundra, has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 20.9.2022 (Annexure P/19) whereby the Retail Dealership has been terminated on the ground of critical irregularities committed under Marketing Discipline Guidelines (hereinafter referred to as “the guidelines” for sort).
2. Facts of the case.
2.1 The petitioner who is a proprietorship firm in the name of M/s. Kanhaiyalal & Co. established a retail outlet of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “IOCL” for sort) for the retail sale and supply of petroleum products i.e. Motor Spirit (petrol), High-Speed Diesel (HSD), etc. on land admeasuring 0.107 Hect., situated at Ward No.11, Akodia Naka, Patwari Halka No. 18, Shujalpur, District Shajapur. ( hereinafter referred to as the Retail Outlet ). A registered lease deed dated 10.3.1999 was executed for the period of 30 years between the petitioner and IOCL. The last dealership agreement was executed on 1.7.2019 between them for a period of 15 years i.e. up to 30.6.2034.
2.2 On 11.4.2022, Shri Nitesh Choudhary, Assistant Manager (Retail Sales), Dewas Sales Area, IOCL and Shri Sukendra, Assistant Manager (Retail Sales, Shajapur Sales Area, IOCL visited the retail outlet and inspected daily sales record, stock verification from totalizer reading, physical stock, safety measures, price display and the charged, inspection of washroom, payment wages, other facilities and pump delivery, quality check of MS and HSD, mobile lab, stock reconciliation, etc. and prepared and submitted the detailed inspection reportand submitted to the head office. Before that, the team of IOCL visited the retail outlet on 1.2.2022. So far as the Dispensing Unit (DU) Sr. No. 201302001387 (in short “DU 1387”) (GVR DU India Make) is concerned, all the seals were found intact, delivery was found correct and the remark OK was given; so far as DU Sr. No. 201308000035 (in short “DU 0035”) (GILBARCO Make) but Weights & Measure (W&M) Display Seal was not found intact and the unit totalizer reading jumped; so far as Nozzle Nos. 12, 13 are concerned, the W&M seals were not found available and No.13, the totalizer reading was found jumped as per the remark.
2.3 These irregularities were treated as critical irregularities in the retail out by the petitioner, therefore, a show-cause notice dated 18.5.2022 was issued to the petitioner calling upon them to submit a reply to the fact-finding inquiry. This SCN was issued by the Divisional Retail Head, Indore DO. In the aforesaid show-cause notice the respondents relied on the report of the Technology Audit and Compliance Cell (TACC) for Gilbarco Veeder Root India Pvt. Ltd. (GVR) (OEM) with respect to the Sealed Electronic Card of two dispensing units i.e. DU 1387 and DU 0035. As per the report, soldering rework was observed near JTAG connector on the back side of CPU card and FRAM and EEPROM IC 7th pin on the back side of the CPU card, which is termed as a manipulated dispensing operation. It was further alleged that Legal Metrology (W&M) seals were not found on the display card of DU 0035, which is also a critical irregularity. The show-cause notice was issued under the provisions of the Dealership Agreement and the Marketing Guidelines effective from 8.1.2013 (MDG) for several minor, major and critical irregularities reported by the two members team (supra).
2.4 The petitioner submitted the detailed reply on 21.6.2022 to the aforesaid show-cause notice. Since the reply was not found satisfactory thereafter the petitioner was served with the IInd show cause notice dated 28.7.2022 proposing the termination of the retail outlet. The petitioner filed a detailed and exhaustive reply to the second showcause notice in defence by submitting that no ground for terminating the retail out is made out. Along with the rep

Hari Vishnu Kamat V/s. Ahmed Ishaque
Sangram Singh V/s. Election Tribunal Kotah
Union of India V/s. LT. Gen. Rajendra Singh Kadyan
State of Orissa V/s. Murlidhar Jena
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education V/s. K.S. Gandhi
Syed Yakoob V/s. K.S. Radhakrishnan
P. Kasilingam V/s. P.S.G. College of Technology
Suresh Koshy George V/s. University of Kerala
State of U.P. V/s. Sudhir Kumar Singh
Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal V/s. M.S.S. Food Products
Sidhartha Sarawgi V/s. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice in administrative actions, ruling that reliance on undisclosed evidence rendered the termination of the dealership arbi....
The judgment established that administrative decisions based on misreading of documents, ignorance of evidence, and without recording reasons are arbitrary and violative of principles of natural just....
The court upheld the cancellation of a diesel sale license due to confirmed tampering of dispensing units, establishing the dealer's responsibility for maintaining equipment integrity.
Judicial review in technical matters is limited; courts should defer to expert findings unless proven arbitrary or unreasonable.
The court upheld the termination of the dealership agreement based on the critical irregularities as per the Marketing Discipline Guidelines.
Consideration of the petitioner's defense and the expert opinion of the OEM is crucial in dealership termination cases to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice.
The Court held that the authorities' decision to terminate the dealership agreement was not arbitrary or unreasonable and that the petitioner had an alternative remedy available through a pending civ....
Termination of dealership without adhering to procedural guidelines and principles of natural justice is unlawful.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.