SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 603

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VISHAL MISHRA, J.
Wahid Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh And Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 42088 of 2025
With
Anju Kol And Others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh And Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 36849 of 2025
Jameel Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh And Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 42091 of 2025
Pappu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh And Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 42094 of 2025
Irfan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh And Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 42117 of 2025
Decided On : 05-12-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the petitioner:Shri Kabeer Paul - Advocate with Shri Aaradhy Shrivastava, Shri Gyanendra Singh Baghel - Advocate
For the respondents/State:Shri Suyash Thakur - Government Advocate

Authorities must adhere to Supreme Court guidelines before demolishing unauthorized constructions, ensuring due process and fairness.

Headnote:(A) Supreme Court Guidelines on Demolition - Directions in the Matter of Demolition of Structures, In re, (2025) 5 SCC 1, Para 94 - Authority required to follow specific procedures before demolishing unauthorized constructions including issuing a show-cause notice, conducting personal hearings, and providing reasoned orders. (Paras 3, 6)

(B) Legal Principles - Authorities must ensure adherence to procedural safeguards as outlined in the Supreme Court’s guidelines to protect the rights of property owners. (Paras 3, 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged notices for removal of unauthorized constructions. They argued that the authority failed to follow Supreme Court directives requiring personal hearings before demolition actions.

Findings of Court:
The court directed compliance with the Supreme Court's guidelines before any extreme measures regarding demolition are undertaken.

Issues: Whether the authorities properly followed the Supreme Court's procedure when issuing demolition notices.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that adherence to procedural fairness as mandated by the Supreme Court is necessary before such extreme actions can be taken against property owners.

Result: Petitions disposed of directing compliance with Supreme Court guidelines.

Table of Content
1. court orders final resolution without costs. (Para 1 , 7)
2. challenge to unauthorized construction notices. (Para 2)
3. guidelines for demolition per supreme court ruling. (Para 3 , 5 , 6)
4. requirements for demolition procedures. (Para 4)

ORDER

This common order shall govern disposal of the aforesaid writ petitions, as the question of law and facts involved herein, are similar.

2. The challenge in these petitions is made to the impugned notices whereby the petitioners have been directed to remove the unauthorized construction raised by them, failing which coercive action shall be taken against them.

3. Counsel appearing for the petitioners has drawn attention of this Court to the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Directions in the Matter of Demolition of Structures, In re , (2025) 5 SCC 1 wherein certain directions/guidelines have been issued. It is submitted that in the present case, the said guidelines are not followed by the authorities and as far as the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in paragraph 94 thereof, they are required to be followed by the authorities. The authorities are required to give personal hearing to the petitioner before taking any extreme steps for demolition of the property and thereafter pass a reasoned order.

4. The operative part of the judgment i.e. Directions in the Matter of Demolition of Structures, In re , (2025) 5 SCC 1 , particularly Para 94 thereof, reads as under :

"94. At the outset, we clarify that these directions will not be applicable if there is an unauthorised structure in any public place such as road, street, footpath, abutting railway line or any river body or water bodies and also to cases where there is an order for demolition made by a court of law.

A. Notice

94.1. No demolition should be carried out without a prior show-cause notice returnable either in accordance with the time provided by the local municipal laws or within 15 days' time from the date of service of such notice, whichever is later.

94.2. The notice shall be served upon the owner/occupier by a registered post A.D. Additionally, the notice shall also be affixed conspicuously on the outer portion of the structure in question.

94.3. The time of 15 days, stated herein above, shall start from the date of receipt of the said notice.

94.4. To prevent any allegation of backdating, we direct that as soon as the show-cause notice is duly served, intimation thereof shall be sent to the office of Collector/District Magistrate of the district digitally by email and an auto generated reply acknowledging receipt of the mail should also be issued from the office of the Collector/District Magistrate. The Collector/DM shall designate a Nodal Officer and also assign an email address and communicate the same to all the municipal and other authorities in charge of building regulations and demolition within one month from today.

94.5. The notice shall contain the details regarding: (a) The nature of the unauthorised construction. (b) The details of the specific violation and the grounds of demolition. (c) A list of documents that the noticee is required to furnish along with his reply. (d) The notice should also specify the date on which the personal hearing is fixed and the designated authority before whom the hearing will take place.

94.6. Every municipal/local authority shall assign a designated digital portal, within 3 months from today wherein details regarding service/pasting of the notice, the reply, the show-cause notice and the order passed thereon would be available.

B. Personal hearing

94.7. The designated authority shall give an opportunity of personal hearing to the person concerned.

94.8. The minutes of such a hearing shall also be recorded.

C. Final order

94.9. Upon hearing, the designated authority shall pass a final order.

94.10. The final order shall contain: (a) The contentions of the noticee, and if the designated authority disagrees with the same, the reasons thereof. (b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top