Ramsevak Sahu vs Mathura Prasad Sahu

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(MP) 920

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
DEEPAK KHOT
Ramsevak Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Mathura Prasad Sahu – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For then Petitioners:Shri Jaideep Sirpurkar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Dinesh Prasad Patel, Government Advocate

Table of Content
1. petitioner aggrieved by lower court's jurisdiction on valuation. (Para 1)
2. counsel argues the court misapplied valuation principles. (Para 2)

ORDER :

DEEPAK KHOT, J.

The present petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed being aggrieved by the order dated 23.07.2025 passed by Additional Judge to the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Garhakota, District Sagar in RCS-A No. 08-A/2023; whereby, the application submitted under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC by the petitioner/defendant has been dismissed.

2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the court below has not appreciated the law on the point of valuation of suit correctly, therefore, the order suffers from jurisdictional error and the learned Court below has committed material illegality and irregularity in not dealing with the question of law in its true perspective.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited attention of this court towards impugned order, wherein, the learned court below while dealing with the issue in regard to valuation has held that the land in question (subject matter of the suit) being an agricultural land has been valued p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document