SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 774

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
SAMBHU NATH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
SUDHA RANI SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

The petitioners before this Court are defendants in Suit for partition, which was instituted by the plaintiff/respondent before the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Haridwar being Suit No.126 of 2014 Sudha Rani vs. Sambhu Nath and others. In the suit in question, the principle decree which was sought by her was in relation to apportionment of her share to the extent of 1/4 of the property in dispute, which she claimed to have succeeded from the predecessors of the property i.e. Late Mr. Shrinath. In this suit the following decree was sought:-

^^vr% oknuh izkFkhZ gS&

¼v½ fMØh cgd oknuh cjf[kykQ izfroknhx.k bl vk'k; ls lkfnj Qjek;h tk;s fd oknxzLr lEifRr esa oknuh dk crkSj okfjl 1@4 Hkkx oknuh dks tqnkxku dj dCtk okLrfod oknuh dks fnyk;k tk;sA

¼c½ fMØh LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk cgd oknuh cjf[kykQ izfroknhx.k bl vk'k; ls lkfnj Qjek;h tk;s fd izfroknhx.k oknxzLr lEifRr esa oknuh ds dCts o iz;ksx esa vk jgh lEifRr ij fo|qr izokg o ty izokg dks u dkVs rFkk oknuh ds dCts o iz;ksx esa vkus okyh pk; dh nqdku ij okfnuh ds dCts iz;ksx esa vkus okyh ySVªhu ckFk:e ij fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ gLr{ksi izR;{k ;k vizR;{k u djsa u djk;sA

¼l½ ;g fd okn [kpZ oknuh dks izfrok

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top