Back
S.TALAPATRA
Harekrishna Roy Chowdhury, son of late Dhirendra Ch. Roy Chowdhury – Appellant
Versus
Debdas Roy Chowdhury, son of late Dhirendra Ch. Roy Chowdhury – Respondent
1. This is an appeal against the judgment of affirmance dated 10.02.2012 delivered in T.A. No. 45 of 2011 by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 5, West Tripura, Agartala, by the defendant No.1.
2. Having proposed, this court formulated two sets of substantial questions of law, one on 06.06.2012 and another on 12.09.2016.
By the order dated 06.06.2012 the following substantial question of law was initially formulated for hearing the appeal:
“Whether the courts below committed error by failing to decide the question of limitation, after framing issue on the said point?”
Subsequently, when the hearing commenced, at the insistence of the appellant, by the order dated 12.09.2016, the following substantial question of law was formulated in addition to the earlier substantial of law:
“Whether the impugned judgment has been passed without considering the evidence of compromise decree of partition [Exhibit-2] and the hand sketch map of solenama [Exhibit-3] or the judgment has been passed solely on the report of the Survey Commission?”
3. For having the prospective of the challenge against the concurrent finding of fact, the relevant fact is required to be introduced brie
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
