IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA, AGARTALA
T. VAIPHEI, S.C. DAS, JJ.
Shri Goutam Dutta, Son of Late Subodh Dutta - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tripura, (Notice to be served through the Public Prosecutor of the High Court of Tripura) - Respondent
CRL. A.(J) No. 68 of 2015
Decided on : 07-12-2016
NDPS Act - Compliance of Section 42(2) - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - The court discussed the compliance of Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act and its impact on the prosecution case. The judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 02.12.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge, Court No.1, Agartala, West Tripura in case No.Special(NDPS) 15 of 2013 in respect of accused-appellant, Gautam Dutta is set aside due to failure of the prosecution to prove compliance of Section 42(2) of NDPS Act.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution case involved the detention and seizure of a vehicle carrying ganja (cannabis) based on information received by the police. The accused, Goutam Dutta, was found guilty of committing an offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove compliance of Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act, leading to the benefit of doubt for the accused. The judgment and order of conviction and sentence were set aside, and the accused was set at liberty.
Issues: The key issue revolved around the compliance of Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act and its impact on the prosecution case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the failure of the prosecution to prove compliance of Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act, leading to the benefit of doubt for the accused.
Final Decision: The judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 02.12.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge, Court No.1, Agartala, West Tripura in case No.Special(NDPS) 15 of 2013 in respect of accused-appellant, Gautam Dutta is set aside. He be set at liberty at once.
S.C. Das, J.
This criminal appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 02.12.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge, Court No.1, Agartala, West Tripura in case No.Special(NDPS) 15 of 2013, where under the learned Special Judge found the accused appellant, Goutam Dutta guilty of committing offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985(for short NDPS Act) and sentenced him to suffer R.I. for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/-(rupees one lakh), in default of payment, to suffer R.I. for further four months.
2. Heard learned senior counsel, Mr. P.K. Biswas, assisted by learned counsel, Mr. P. Majumder for the appellant and learned Addl. P.P., Mr. R.C. Debnath for the State respondent.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that on 23.11.2013 at about 1100 hrs., S.I. Debabrata Biswas of Bishalgarh Police Station(PW1) received an information over telephone from Inspector Navin Choudhury of "G" Branch, B.S.F., Gakulnagar(PW8) that one Maruti OMNI vehicle, bearing No.TR-01-AA-0553 loaded with huge quantity of ganja(cannabis) was moving from Melaghar side towards Agartala. He entered the information in Bishalgarh P.S. G.D.E.No.1078 dated 23.11.2013 and informed the Sub- Divisional Police Officer(SDPO, for short), Bishalgarh verbally over telephone and thereafter S.I. Debabrata Biswas along with Ms. Sarmistha Chakraborty, SDPO, Bishalgarh(PW2) and Inspector Navin Choudhury of BSF with other security personnel went to the approach road near Rabindra Nath Tagore College at Gakulnagar on national highway and kept on waiting there. At about 1240 hrs., they found one Maruti OMNI vehicle, bearing No.TR-01-AA-0553 approaching towards Agartala with abnormal high speed and they gave signal to stop the vehicle but the vehicle tried to escape and dashed to the roadside wall and it was captured by S.I. Debabrata Biswas, SDPO, Bishalgarh and Inspector, Navin Choudhury and other security staffs. In the meantime, local people also gathered there. There were two persons in the vehicle. Out of them one Goutam Dutta was the driver of the vehicle and another person Tapas Saha(owner of the vehicle) was also in the vehicle and they disclosed their names and identities. On search of the vehicle 9(nine) plastic bags of dry ganja was recovered which was weighted and found to be 95 kg. in total and thereafter S.I. Debabrata Biswas seized the same by preparing a seizure list in presence of PWs 2 and 8 and other witnesses and arrested accused Goutam Dutta and Tapas Saha and thereafter proceeded to the P.S. S.I. Debabrata Biswas lodged suo motu FIR before O/C, Bishalgarh P.S. and accordingly Bishalgarh P.S. case No.245 of 2013 under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act was registered against arrested accused Goutam Dutta and Tapas Saha and investigation was entrusted to S.I. Prasanta Kr. Dey.
During investigation samples were collected from the seized ganja, inventory was prepared in presence of the Magistrate and the samples were sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory for scientific examination and report and the report was collected. Material witnesses were examined and thereafter charge sheet was filed against both the accused.
4. Learned Special Judge, in course of trial on 26.03.2014 framed charges against both the accused for commission of offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
5. In course of trial, prosecution examined 11(eleven) witnesses, namely:
PW1 Sri Debabrata Biswas
PW2 Miss Sarmistha Chakraborty
PW3 Sri Bishnu Rabi Das
PW4 Sri Subrata Debbarma
PW5 Sri Pradip Kumar Ghosh
PW6 Sri Ashish Chowdhury
PW7 Sri Supriya Chakraborty
PW8 SI Navin Choudhury
PW9 Sri Monoranjan Debbarma
PW10 Sri Suman Kumar Chakraborty
PW11 Sri Prasanta Kumar Dey.
Prosecution also proved the following documents and materials, namely-
Exbt
Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri v. State of Gujarat
Govind Lal Chaggan Lal Patel v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee
K.L. Subhayya v. State of Karnataka
Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana
Kishan Chand v. State of Haryana
Sajan Abraham v. State of Kerala
State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh
State of Rajasthan v. Jag Raj Singh alias Hansa
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.