S.TALAPATRA
Nirananda Sinha, Son of Late Surja Moni Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
1. This is an appeal by the convict namely, Sri Nirananda Sinha, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 09.09.2014 delivered in S.T.03(NT/D) of 2013.
2. The genesis of the prosecution is rooted in the complaint filed by the victim, name withheld for purpose of protecting her identity. It had been alleged in the complaint that after her marriage with one of the co-accused, namely Hariballab Sinha she went to the house of the accused persons for leading her conjugal life but immediately after her reaching there, on such unlawful demand she was subjected to physical and mental torture. All the accused persons had committed assault on her on such unlawful demand. They used to keep her without any food and force her to work throughout the day. Her husband, one of the co-accused had gone to Aizwal. During his absence, the other accused persons continued and increased the level of torture. Those accused persons repeated their demand for ‘dowry’. Even they informed her parents. Her father came to the house of the accused persons with one of her maternal uncle. On that very night, she was assaulted b
Gurcharan Singh and another vs. State of Punjab
Mrs. Rupan Deol Bajaj & Anr. Vs. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill & Anr
Nisar Ali vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Rai Singh vs. The State of Haryana
Ranbir and others vs. State of Punjab
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.