S. TALAPATRA
Devendra Kumar Singh, son of Alpeshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) – Respondent
This is an application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for granting bail to the accused-person, namely Dharmendra Kumar Singh in connection with S.T.(T-1)16 of 2018 arising from Bodhjungnagar P.S. Case No.50 of 2017 under Section 302 of the IPC.
2. The accused-person is in the custody since 24.11.2017, meaning he is in the custody for 368 days on the day of filing of this application on 27.11.2018.
3. On perusal of the records what appears that a serious development has taken place in the midst of the trial. The State Government has provided consent under Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 by the Notification No.21(2)-PD/12(P)/873 dated 17.03.2018 [issued by the Home Department, Govt. of Tripura]. Pursuant thereto, the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, DOPT, Govt. of India, has asked the CBI by their Notification No.228/15/2018-AVD.II dated 06.06.2018 to take up the investigation of Bodhjungnagar P.S. Case No.2017/BJN/050 dated 21.11.2017 under Section 302 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered the regular case bearing No. RC 02/S/2018/Kolkata dated 29.06.2018 u
Achpal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan allias Pappu Yadav & Anr.
Kanwar Singh Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Rakesh Kumar Paul vs. State of Assam
Ranbeer Shokeen v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Sanjay Dutt v. State through C.B.I., Bombay (II)
Sanjay Kumar Kedia v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau and Anr.
State of W.B. v. Dinesh Dalmia
Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra. (2001) 5 SCC 453
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.