IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AT AGARTALA
AKIL KURESHI, S.G.CHATTOPADHYAY, JJ.
Shri Debasish Mazumder, S/o Sri Milan Chandra Mazumder - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tripura – Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 319 of 2020
Decided on : 22-03-2021
Tripura Panchayats Act, 1993 - Section 76 (3) - Tripura Panchayats (Administration) Rules, 1994 - Rule 23 (2) - No confidence motion - Violation of Party - Panchayat Samiti Election - Petitioners Earned Disqualification for Voting in Panchayat Samiti Meeting - Petitioners and Respondent No.7 Issued a Notice - Seeking Removal of Chairman - Petitioners were elected as members of Bokafa Panchayat Samiti in South Tripura from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in Panchayat Samiti Election - Said Panchayat Samity consisted of 9 elected members - Other than petitioners, respondent No.7 and proforma respondent no 9, 10 & 11 were other elected members of Panchayat Samiti - After their election as members of Bokafa Panchayat Samiti from same political party they elected Respondent No. 11 as Chairman and Respondent No.7 as Vice-Chairman of said Panchayat Samiti - Performance of Chairman not being satisfactory, majority of elected members including petitioners and Respondent No.7 issued a notice to District Panchayat Officer, respondent no.3 seeking removal of Chairman of said Panchayat Samiti - District Panchayat Officer [Respondent No3] then convened a meeting for removal of Chairman in Panchayat Samiti hall and issued notice to all elected members of said Panchayat Samiti to attend meeting.
Finding of the Court: Court has succinctly held that in a democracy governed by rule of law, removal of an elected candidate from his office before expiry of statutory term for which he has been elected is a serious matter - In a democracy governed by rule of law, once elected to an office in a democratic institution, the incumbent is entitled to hold the office for the term for which he has been elected unless his election is set aside by a prescribed procedure known to law - That a returned candidate must hold and enjoy the office and discharge the duties related therewith during the term specified by the relevant enactment is a valuable statutory right not only of the returned candidate but also of the constituency or the electoral college which he represents - Removal from such an office is a serious matter. It curtails the statutory term of holder of office - A stigma is cast on the holder of the office in view of certain allegations having been held proved rendering him - impugned order dated 27.03.2020 issued by the District Magistrate and Collector, South Tripura disqualifying the petitioners from the membership of Bokafa Panchayat Samiti for alleged violation of party whip is set aside.
Result: Writ petition is allowed
JUDGMENT :
S.G.Chattopadhyay, J.
1. Petitioners, who are the elected members of Bokafa Panchayat Samiti in South Tripura District, have challenged the order dated 27.03.2020 passed by the District Magistrate and Collector of South Tripura District[Respondent No.2] in purported exercise of powers under sub-section(3) of Section 76 of the Tripura Panchayats Act, 1993 declaring that the petitioners earned disqualification under clause(b) of sub-section(1) of Section 76 of the Act for voting in the Panchayat Samiti meeting held on 11.02.2020 contrary to the direction of the party.
2. The said petitioners were elected as members of Bokafa Panchayat Samiti in South Tripura from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the Panchayat Samiti election held in 2019. The said Panchayat Samity consisted of 9 elected members. Other than the petitioners, respondent No.7 and proforma respondent no 9, 10 & 11 were the other elected members of the Panchayat Samiti. After their election as members of Bokafa Panchayat Samiti from the same political party they elected Respondent No. 11 Sridam Das as Chairman and Respondent No.7 Sri Avijit Mitra as Vice-Chairman of the said Panchayat Samiti. Performance of the Chairman not being satisfactory, majority of the elected members including the petitioners and Respondent No.7 issued a notice dated 20.01.2020 [Annexure-1] to the District Panchayat Officer, South Tripura [respondent no.3] seeking removal of the Chairman of the said Panchayat Samiti. In response, the District Panchayat Officer [Respondent No.3] vide his letter dated 28.01.2020 [Annexure-2] requested the said members to submit their proposal in Form-4 in terms of sub-rule(2) of Rule 23 of the Tripura Panchayats (Administration) Rules, 1994. Accordingly they submitted the proposal [Annexure-3] in Form-4 in terms of the advice of the District Panchayat Officer. The District Panchayat Officer [Respondent No3] then convened a meeting for removal of the Chairman on 11.02.2020 at 11 A.M in the Panchayat Samiti hall at Bokafa and issued notice dated 01.02.2020[Annexure-4] to all elected members of the said Panchayat Samiti to attend the meeting. The members were also informed that Anita Mog, Panchayat Officer [Respondent No.5] will preside over the meeting and Sri Anish Debnath, Assistant Director of Panchayat [Respondent No.6] will act as an observer in the said meeting. The meeting was held on the appointed date and in the said meeting all the 5 petitioners cast their votes in favour of the no confidence motion by raising their hands. Accordingly, the no confidence motion against the Chairman of the Panchayat Samiti was passed by the majority vote of 5 petitioners in the said Panchayat Samiti consisting of 9 elected members and the District Panchayat Officer [Respondent No.3] vide order dated 24.02.2020 [Annexure-5] removed Sri Sridam Das, Respondent No.11 from the office of the Chairman of the said Panchayat Samiti. Thereafter, the District Magistrate and Collector [Respondent No.2] vide memorandum dated 13.03.2020 [Annexure-6] asked the petitioners to show cause as to why they shall not be disqualified from membership of the said Panchayat Samiti in terms of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 76 of the Tripura Panchayats Act, 1993 for voting against party whip in the said meeting of Bokafa Panchayat Samiti held on 11.02.2020. The petitioners submitted their reply [Annexure-7]. Thereafter, the District Magistrate and Collector [Respondent No.2] vide impugned order dated 27.03.2020 [Annexure-11] declared that the petitioners earned disqualification under Section 76(1)(b) of the Panchayats Act, 1933 for voting contrary to the direction of the party. Hence the petitioners have filed this petition for quashing the impugned order of Respondent No.2.
3. In their counter affidavit, State respondent No.1 to 4 stated that the State BJP president authorized the District President of BJP, Shri Sankar Roy to issue the party whip to the elected members of Bokafa Pan
Jyoti Basu v. Debi Ghosal [(1982) 1 SCC 691 : AIR 1982 SC 983]
Mohan Lal Tripathi v. District Magistrate
Ram Beti v. District Panchayat Raj Adhikari [(1998) 1 SCC 680 : AIR 1998 SC 1222]
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir v. District Collector
Tarlochan Dev Sharma vs. State of Punjab and Ors. reported in AIR 2001 SC 2524
SupremeToday
Election - Nomination and Removal of Members - Qualification and Disqualification - Removal of Chairman/Vice-Chairman of Panchayat Samiti - An elected member can be removed in exceptional circumstanc....
Decisions impacting rights of elected representatives must adhere to natural justice, including providing notice and opportunity for hearing.
Imposition of a Group Leader otherwise than by democratic process cuts at roots of democracy and certainly it is in violation of Rules.
Election - Disqualification on ground of defection - Petitioner has violated the whip and invited the impugned order. Violation alleged in terms of Section 4 with regard to 24 hours as held by this C....
Point of Law : Principle that justice must not only be done but it must eminently appear to be done as well is equally applicable to quasi-judicial proceeding if such a proceeding has to inspire con....
High Court in exercising the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was totally erroneous.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the provisions of Rule 17(6) and Rule 18 of the West Bengal Panchayat (Constitution) Rules, 1975, in the cont....
There can be many inferences for voluntarily giving up the membership even if one has not resigned; the case at hand is one where the petitioners have all resigned, therefore, no inference need be dr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.