IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AT AGARTALA
S.G. CHATTOPADHYAY, J.
The National Insurance Company Ltd. – Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Pratibha Das W/o Late Ashutosh Das – Respondent
MAC App. No. 11 of 2021
Decided On : 23-04-2021
Claim petition - Death - Road traffic accident - Claim petition arose out of death a permanent employee of Jute Mills Limited, who died in a road traffic accident at Agartala on leaving behind his wife, 03 sons and 03 daughters - there Dependent family members of deceased, 1/5 deduction from income of deceased for personal and living expenses made by Tribunal for purpose of assessing loss of dependency was erroneou - Tribunal should have assessed his annual income after deducting 10% of income for income tax not go into other issues save and except issues raised by insurer appellant.
Finding of the Court:
Each of them was living in their respective matrimonial home - Therefore, though they were entitled to claim compensation for death of their father as his legal representatives, they cannot be considered as dependent family members of deceased for purpose of deduction towards personal and living expenses - Rate of interest awarded by Tribunal will remain unchanged which will be paid from date of filing of claim petition at the tribunal till payment - Claimants will have equal share of the compensation except amount granted to the wife of deceased for loss of consortium - Amount already paid, if any, shall be deducted from the amount awarded hereunder.
Result: Appeal is disposed of.
ORDER :
1. By means of filing this appeal, the insurance company has challenged the award dated 20.04.2019 passed by MAC Tribunal (No. 5) West Tripura, Agartala in T.S. (MAC) No. 120 of 2017.
2. The claim petition arose out of the death of Ashutosh Das, a permanent employee of Tripura Jute Mills Limited, who died in a road traffic accident at Agartala on 19.05.2017 leaving behind his wife, 03 sons and 03 daughters.
3. Prayers made by the appellant insurer in the memo of appeal are as under:
(a) Admit the appeal.
(b) Call for the record of T.S. (MAC) No. 120 of 2017 from the then Ld. Member, Sri. S. Bhattacharjee, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court No. 5, West Tripura District, Agartala.
(c) Issue Notice upon the respondents.
And
After hearing both the parties Hon’ble Court would be pleased enough after setting aside the impugned Award dated 20.04.2019 kindly modify the direction of the impugned Award to the effect firstly, that number of dependent on the income of the deceased be one(1) instead of seven (7) and thus 1/3rd instead of 1/5th of the monthly income be deducted as personal expenses, secondly 10% of the monthly salary would be deducted as income tax in order to assess actual monthly income of the deceased and thirdly, no amount as future prospect would be added with the monthly income since the deceased was above 60 years of age at the time of death.
And
For this act of kindness the applicant shall ever pray.”
4. The insurer has, thus, assailed the impugned award raising the following issues:
(ii) Addition of 15% of the actual salary to the income of the deceased towards future prospect was erroneous because the deceased was above 60 years of age and as per the decision of the Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Company vs. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680, there would be no such deduction where the deceased exceeded 60 years of age.
(iii) Tribunal should have assessed his annual income after deducting 10% of the income for income tax.
5. In view of the limited grounds of appeal, this court will not go into other issues save and except the issues raised by the insurer appellant.
6. Factual background of the case is that on 18.05.2017, the deceased after visiting his ailing daughter-in-law in Asha nursing home at Palace compound, Agartala was returning home at around 8.30 p.m. On his way, he was hit by the offending motor bike carrying Registration No. TR-01-0568. As a result, he sustained grievous injuries. Despite treatment in AGMC and GBP Hospital at Agartala, he succumbed to his injuries at around 2.30 a.m. on the following day.
7. His wife, 3 sons and 3 daughters being claimants filed a claim petition at the MAC Tribunal (No. 5), West Tripura Judicial District at Agartala claiming compensation to the tune of Rs. 25 lakhs. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the Tribunal framed issues and recorded the evidence adduced by the parties and determined the compensation payble to the claimant at Rs. 27,76,160/- with 9% annual interest on the said amount w.e.f. the date of filing of the claim petition till payment and passed the following order:
17. In the result, claim is awarded in following terms:-
(i) Claimant petitioners are entitled to get the award of Rs. 27,76,160/- (Twenty Seven Lacs Seventy Six thousand one hundred sixty) only with 9% Simple interest per annum from the date of registration of claim i.e. w.e.f
National Insurance Company vs. Pranay Sethi
Sarla Verma and Others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another
Smt. Manjuri Bera vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and Another
Accident claim - Claimant living in their respective matrimonial home - Not dependent and not entitled for compensation.
The court established that in calculating compensation for motor accident claims, future income prospects should be considered, deductions for personal expenses must reflect the actual number of depe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the proper calculation of compensation in motor accident claims, including the deceased's income, loss of dependency, future prospects, and loss of....
Point of Law : Order 41 Rule 33 CPC enables an appellate court to pass any order which ought to have been passed by the trial court and to make such further or other order as the case may require, ev....
The court's decision emphasized the proper calculation of compensation based on the deceased's income, future prospects, and dependency, and the application of the appropriate interest rate.
The Court applied the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in determining compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing the retrospective applicability of Supreme Court decisions.
Legal representatives of a deceased are entitled to claim compensation regardless of dependency status, and proper deductions for personal expenses must be applied based on the number of dependants.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.