SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 165

ARINDAM LODH
Ranadhir Debbarma – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Others – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. PK Ghosh, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. PK Dhar, Sr. GA, Ms. Sarama Deb, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has raised his grievance for his application for reimbursement of medical bills being arbitrarily rejected by the respondents.

The facts are that, the mother of the petitioner was suffering from acute cancer. Considering the eligibility of the petitioner being an employee under the State-respondents, his mother was referred to TATA Medical Centre, Kolkata by an authorized Medical Board of the Government of Tripura as she was suffering from cancer. The mother of the petitioner was treated there in the hospital. After completion of treatment, she was advised to follow-up action. Thereafter, the petitioner came back to Agartala leaving his mother in Kolkata. After few days, the petitioner was informed by his mother about her further complications. Accordingly, the petitioner went to Kolkata and he took his mother to TATA Medical Centre for treatment. It is pertinent to mention here that from the discharge summary dated 10.05.2018, it is revealed that the mother of the petitioner was advised to consult with Cardiology Unit of AMRI hospital preferably with Dr. Manojit Lodha/ Dr. Subhasish Roy Choudhury. Accordingly, his m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top