Back
ARINDAM LODH
Pradip Datta – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Heard Mr. A. Acharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A.K.Deb, learned panel counsel appearing for the State-respondents.
2. This is a case filed by the petitioner being his application for medical reimbursement was rejected by the State-respondents. It is the case of the petitioner that his daughter was suffering from illness and she was under treatment of Dr. J. L. Roy, Agartala, Tripura. The petitioner had paid visit to Hyderabad for better treatment of his daughter. For two occasions, the petitioner went to Hyderabad for the treatment of his daughter. During those two occasions, the said daughter was escorted by the petitioner as well as his wife. During second visit, the wife of the petitioner fell ill and on being examined by the Doctors of Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology (for short, AINU), in her kidney stone was detected. The wife of the petitioner, Smt. Lipika Das Datta, underwent surgery there and removed the stone. After returning from Hyderabad, the petitioner submitted bills for medical reimbursement as he was eligible for such reimbursement of medical bills for the treatment of his wife. The said bills were rejected by th
Compliance with government guidelines for medical reimbursement claims is mandatory, and an emergency must be adequately demonstrated to bypass procedural requirements.
Medical reimbursement – Grant of - Illness they suffered was unforeseen, which circumstances the respondents had failed to take into account while regretting the claim of the petitioner for reimburse....
The right to medical aid is fundamental under Article 21, and reimbursement for treatment at private hospitals during emergencies cannot be denied, upholding the principles of fairness and timely adm....
The obligation of the department to reimburse medical treatment in a private or unrecognized hospital as per the applicable Rules, despite technicalities of the Medi-claim policy.
Government servants are not altogether barred from seeking medical treatment in a hospital outside the state, provided there is an emergency and it is certified by the competent authority.
The Court affirmed that reimbursement guidelines should be interpreted flexibly to support employees seeking medical treatment, especially when circumstances prevent strict adherence to procedural ti....
The main legal point established is that the department is obligated to reimburse the amount for medical treatment undertaken in a private or unrecognized hospital, to the extent permissible under th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
