SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 119

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
T. Amarnath Goud, Arindam Lodh, JJ.
Sunil Debbarma @ Kutula - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura - Respondent
Crl. A(J) No. 13 of 2020
Decided On : 05-01-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rajib Saha, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S. Debnath, Addl. P.P, for the Respondent

Circumstantial evidence must form a consistent narrative establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with each item linking the accused to the crime.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 364, and 201 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374 - Conviction of appellant for murder and other offenses based on circumstantial evidence provided by prosecution. (Paras 2, 8, 11, 32)

(B) The principles of circumstantial evidence require that all elements must be consistent with the guilt of the accused and inconsistent with innocence. (Paras 11, 34)

(C) The court affirmed that the discovery of the weapon and the dead body led to the conclusion of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 31, 32)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, Sunil Debbarma @ Kutula, was convicted for the murder of Sanjit Das after hiring his auto rickshaw with intent to kill him and sell the vehicle. (Paras 2, 4, 12)

Findings of Court:
The prosecution presented a strong case linking the accused to the crime through circumstantial evidence, establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 29, 32)

Issues: The court addressed whether the evidence was sufficient to uphold the conviction given the circumstantial nature of the evidence. (Paras 11, 30)

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the circumstantial evidence established a clear link between the accused and the crime, supporting the conviction with consistent testimonies and physical evidence. (Paras 32, 34)

Result: The appeal stands dismissed.

Table of Content
1. conviction basis established via fir. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. inconsistencies in witness statements raise doubts. (Para 9 , 10)
3. prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 11 , 30)
4. intent to commit murder for gain analyzed. (Para 12 , 14 , 15)
5. circumstantial evidence leads to guilt conclusion. (Para 31 , 32)
6. appeal dismissed; conviction affirmed. (Para 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - Heard Mr. R. Saha, learned counsel appearing for the convict-appellant. Also heard Mr. S. Debnath, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State-respondent.

2. This criminal appeal under Section-374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 13.07.2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonamura, West Tripura Judicial District, in connection with case No. S.T. (T-1) 12 of 2014, whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted under Sections-364/302/201 of IPC and thereby, sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for committing offence under Section-364 of IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer further imprisonment of 3[three] months. Further, he has been sentenced to suffer R.I for life for committing offence under Section-302 of IPC with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to suffer further imprisonment of 3[three] months and further to suffer RI for 7[seven] years for committing offence under Section-201 of IPC with default stipulations. It was directed that both these sentences shall run concurrently.

3. The facts which set the criminal law in motion, in short, are that on 7th day of December, 2013 at about 10.35 hours one Sri Bishu Das (PW-7), of Village-Bagmara, District-Sepahijala appeared before the O/C Melaghar police station and lodged a written FIR against the accused-person Sunil Debbarma, son of Sitaram Debbarma of Village- Neuramura, P.S. Melaghar and two others namely, Rai Chandra Noatia and Khirode Tripura alleging inter alia that his cousin Sanjit Das, aged about 30 years, son of Subodh Das of Village- Powangbari, P.S. Melaghar was an auto rickshaw driver by profession and he was also the registered owner of an auto rickshaw bearing registration No. TR-01-D-4263. On 6th day of December, 2013 Friday, at about 07.00am victim Sanjit Das (deceased herein) had left his residence with his auto rickshaw like other days but said Sanjit Das did not return home at night. At the relevant time, victim Sanjit Das was carrying one black colour Samsung Mobile phone with sim No. 9856988417. There was also some cash money in the pocket of Sanjit Das. as the victim did not return home at night, on 07.12.2013 at about 08.00am informant Sri Bishu Das visited Melaghar motor stand and talked with several persons when he came to learn that on 06.12.2013 at about 03.00pm three tribal young boys had hired the auto rickshaw of the victim with intent to go to Birchandra Manu and since that time the victim was traceless. It has been further stated that on 7th December, 2013 in the morning Smt. Madhabi Das (PW-9), wife of the deceased lodged a missing diary with Melaghar P.S. Then and there, police started an inquiry and they recovered the auto rickshaw of the victim from the village Induria and at about 08.00 pm the informant received one telephone call from Melaghar P.S. with a request to visit Melaghar P.S. along with the family members of the victim. Thereafter, the informant along with the family members of the victim visited Melaghar P.S. when the informant and others were taken at Bhuraghat under Kakraban police station by the police personnel of Melaghar police station and, thereafter, all of them entered into a rubber garden whereat they found the dead body of the victim Sanjit Das with bleeding injuries. The vocal cord of the deceased was cut by sharp cutting weapon. There were so many marks of injuries caused by sharp cutting weapon in the dead body of the deceased. At

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top