SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 122

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
S. Talapatra, J.
Ruma Bhattacharya - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) 69 of 2021
Decided On : 19-01-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. K. Chakraborty, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. M. Debbarma, Addl. G.A, for the Respondents

The court reaffirmed that eligible academic staff must receive due increments and AGP movements as stipulated by UGC regulations, ensuring proper recognition of qualifications and prior service conditions.

Headnote:(A) University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Career Advancement Scheme - Notifications dated 18.05.2013, 02.07.2015, and 09.10.2017 - Writ petition regarding non-release of increments and AGP adjustments - The petitioner, an Associate Professor, challenged delays in her movement between AGPs and non-compounded increments for M.Phil and Ph.D. degrees. (Para 1, 12)

(B) Rights under UGC regulations - Entitlement to financial benefits and increments contingent upon fulfillment of conditions outlined in UGC notifications and applicable regulations. (Para 25)

(C) Jurisdiction of court - The court held that eligible candidates must receive due credits under established schemes - Respective rights must be recognized within stipulated periods as per service regulations. (Para 21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner seeks redressal for delayed progression through academic grade pays (AGPs) and compensation for unpaid increments despite meeting eligibility criteria. Disputes relate to movements based on the UGC's guidelines for Ph.D. and M.Phil recognition and the applicable notifications. (Paras 1-6)

Findings of Court:
The petitioner was entitled to movement in AGPs along specified timelines and to back payments for owed increments, which are to be released within three months. (Paras 21, 27)

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to due academic benefits as per UGC notifications and the circumstances surrounding her qualification as an Associate Professor. (Paras 12, 20)

Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that the conditions set by UGC regulations must be upheld, affirming the petitioner's eligibility for due increments and AGP adjustments as they directly impacted her financial entitlements. (Paras 21, 26)

Result: Writ petition allowed; respondents directed to implement adjustments and payments within three months. (Para 28)

Table of Content
1. petitioner's challenge against delayed agp movements. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's qualifications and entitlement to agp. (Para 2 , 6)
3. details of agp movements and notifications. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
4. incentives for m.phil and ph.d. under ugc regulations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. arguments on ugc guidelines and petitioner's claims. (Para 12 , 13 , 15)
6. previous judicial determinations supporting petitioner's claims. (Para 19 , 24)
7. court's decision on agp movements and increments. (Para 21 , 22)
8. final order and directive to the respondents. (Para 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner, who is presently serving as Associate Professor, being posted at Ramthakur College under the Education (Higher) Department, Government of Tripura, has by means of this writ petition, challenged the notifications dated 18.05.2013, 02.07.2015 and 09.10.2017 [Annexures-7, 8 & 9 respectively]. By those notifications even though the movement to higher AGPs were given, but the movements were not given on due dates, to the serious prejudice of the petitioner. The petitioner has further urged for directing the respondents to release one unpaid non-compounded increment out of two non-compounded increments for possessing M. Phil degree at the time of entry in the service as Asst. Professor and also to release three non-compounded unpaid advance increments for completing Ph.D. while she was in service. That apart, the petitioner has also urged for granting her AGP (Academic Grade Pay) of Rs.7,000/- w.e.f. 14.01.2008 on completion of four years of service, AGP of Rs.8,000/- w.e.f. 14.01.2003 on completion of five years of service from AGP of Rs.7,000/- and AGP of Rs.9,000/- with designation of Associate Professor w.e.f. 14.01.2016, on completion of three years of service in AGP of Rs.8,000/- along with arrears. In addition, the petitioner has urged this Court for directing the respondents to record her Ph.D. degree in her service book which was conferred on 28.07.2006.

2. The petitioner was selected by the Tripura Public Service Commission (TPSC for short), for recruitment to the post of Assistant Professor, Government Degree Colleges, Tripura pursuant to the advertisement No. 09/2009. In terms of the offer contained in the Memorandum dated 06.12.2003 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition), the petitioner was appointed by the notification dated 27.12.2003 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) in the pay scale of Rs.8,000 - 13,500 as revised by the UGC pay scale, 1996 and she was asked to join K.N. Mahavidyalaya, Sonamura. The petitioner joined the said place of posting on 14.01.2004 as Assistant Professor. At the time of entry in the service, the petitioner had the degree of M.Phil from M.S. University of Baroda and she had cleared the National Eligibility Test as conducted by the University Grants Commission (UGC, for short). It is noteworthy that the petitioner had completed her Ph.D. from M.S. University of Baroda while in service on 28.07.2006, when the syndicate of the said University declared the petitioner qualified for award of Ph.D. degree. It is evident from the declaration dated 24.08.2006 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) that the syndicate of the said University in their meeting held on 24.08.2006 had declared the petitioner to have qualified for award of Ph.D. Degree. Thereafter, in the convocation which was held on 17.10.2006 the petitioner was conferred the degree certificate of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D) in History. The said certificate, as referred, is available at Annexure-6 to the writ petition.

3. It is also evident from the notification dated 18.05.2013 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) that on recommendation of the Screening Committee as constituted by the Education Department vide notification dated 22.09.2012, the petitioner was moved to AGP of Rs.7,000/- from AGP of Rs.6,000/- w.e.f. 14.01.2020.

4. Thereafter, on recommendation of the Screening Committee as constituted by the Education (Higher) Department by their notification dated 01.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top