Back
ARINDAM LODH
Tripura State Electricity Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Shashindra Tanti – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of negligence in electric wire case. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments over negligence and compensation quantification. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. final decision and reaffirmation of lower court judgment. (Para 9 , 15) |
| 4. court analysis on evidence and negligence standards. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. N. Majumder, learned counsel for the appellant-Tripura State Electricity Corporation Limited (for short, TSECL). Also heard Ms. R. Purkayastha, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff-respondent and Mr. M. Debbarma, learned Additional GA appearing for the respondent-State.
2. Both the appeal and the cross-objection are taken up together since common questions of law are involved.
3. The appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the CPC against the judgment dated 26.09.2019 and decree dated 03.10.2019 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, North Tripura, Dharmanagar, in connection with case no. Money Suit 14 of 2017.
4. The brief facts of the case, are that, the plaintiff, being the husband of the deceased had filed a Money suit being No. M.S. 14 of 2017 for the death of his wife out of electrocution on 01.04.2017 at
Negligence involves failure to exercise due care, which includes foreseeability of harm, and leads to liability when conduct results in damage.
The main legal point established is that just compensation should be awarded based on the actual income sources of the deceased and the evidence presented.
Electricity providers have a strict liability to maintain safety standards, and failure to do so resulting in harm establishes negligence.
Electricity suppliers are strictly liable for injuries caused by their infrastructure, regardless of negligence, and must compensate victims for losses incurred.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of authorities to prevent mishaps related to electricity transmission lines, and the liability of the supplier of electric energy in cases....
The judgment established the principle that those involved in the transmission of high-voltage electric energy are liable for damages caused by its uncontrolled escape, and it applied the principles ....
The Electricity Board has an obligation to maintain electrical infrastructure safely and any failure thereof constitutes negligence, barring unsupported claims of contributory negligence against affe....
Defendants held liable for negligence in maintaining electricity wires leading to electrocution, affirming trial court's compensation award.
The duty of care owed by the Electricity Board in hazardous activities and the application of the multiplier method for determining the quantum of compensation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
