HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Indrajit Mahanty, CJ., S.G. Chattopadhyay, J.
Tripura Public Service Commission & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Malabika Shil & Ors. - Respondents
WA No. 36 of 2020
Decided On : 13-04-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of appointment process (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. cancellation of recommendation argued against legality (Para 8 , 10 , 13) |
| 3. distinction between selection and appointment (Para 15 , 16 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. final judgment and directions issued (Para 18 , 30) |
| 5. criteria for eligibility at application closing date (Para 24 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - The present writ appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 27.11.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 1310 of 2017.
2. The factual background of the case is as under:
Appellant came out with an advertisement dated 01.07.2016 inviting applications for filling up 34 permanent posts of Dental Surgeon under the Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Tripura. The said advertisement contained that educational qualifications for the post would be as under:
'(a) Essential:- A recognized Dental qualification included in Part-I & Part-III of the Schedule of the Dentist Act, 1948, as appended to this schedule.
(b) Preferable:
(i) Recognized post-graduate degree as appended to this schedule.
(ii) Working knowledge of Bengali.'
3. It was also stipulated in the said advertisement that the applicants must be in possession of the prescribed minimum qualification(s) for the post on the closing date for submission of applications as mentioned in the said advertisement and the closing date for submission of application was mentioned as 30.07.2016. The advertisement also contained that decision of the Tripura Public Service Commission as to the eligibility or otherwise of a candidate at any stage of selection process shall be final.
4. Pursuant to the said advertisement, respondent No. 1 (the original writ petitioner) who passed the fourth professional examination of Bachelor of Dental Surgery from Srimanta Sankaradeva University of Health Sciences, Guwahati, Assam in June, 2015 submitted her application for the said post of Dental Surgeon on 22.07.2016. Thereafter, on the basis of a written communication dated 07.12.2016 received from the Director of Health Services, Government of Tripura, the appellant published a notification dated 09.12.2016 clarifying that registration certificate after completion of BDS/MDS would be essential for appointment to the post of Dental Surgeon. Under the said notification, the candidates who applied for the post were informed that those who did not submit registration certificate along with their application form would be provisionally allowed to sit in the written screening test. But they would have to submit registration certificate issued on or before the closing date of receipt of application i.e. 30.07.2016 during the interview process failing which his/her candidature would be summarily rejected. It would be appropriate to reproduce the said notification dated 09.12.2016 which is as under:
'NOTIFICATION
No. F.11(26-17)-Rectt./TPSC/2013
Agartala
Dated, 9th December, 2016
Ref:- Commission's Advt. No. 06/2016 dated, 27.06.2016.
The recruitment rule for the post of Dental Surgeon, Ex Cadre under Health & Family Welfare Department, Govt. of Tripura contains no specific guide line for submission of registration Certificate with application form.
The Health & Family Welfare Dept. vide its letter No. F.3(479)-HFW/2016 dated 07.12.2016 informed that Registration Certificate after completion of BDS/MDS is essential for appointment to the post of Dental Surgeon.
It is for information of all concerned that the candidates who did not submit Registration Certificate along with the application form will be provisionally allowed to sit in the written screening test. The candidates will have to submit Registration Certificate issued on or before the closing date of receipt of application i.e. 30.07.2016 during the interview process failing which his/her candidature will be summarily rejected. Other terms and condition shall remain unchanged.
For Further details please visit-wwe.tpsc.gov.in.
Sd/-
(S. Riyan)
Secretary,
TPSC'
5. T
Ashok Kumar Sharma vs. Chander Shekhar
Bhupinderpal Singh vs. State of Punjab (2000) 5 SCC 262
Dheeraj Mor vs. High Court of Delhi
Sabita Prasad & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Shankarsan Dash vs. Union of India
Soham Mayankkumar Vyas vs. Union of India
U.P. Public Service Commission vs. Alpana (1994) 2 SCC 723
Vijay Kumar Mishra & Ors. vs. High Court of Judicature of Patna & Ors.
Eligibility for public service roles must strictly adhere to announced qualifications as of application deadlines; candidates cannot be disqualified based on later-acquired qualifications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principle of estoppel in the context of recruitment disputes and the requirement for a clear definition of 'competent author....
The delay in obtaining a required certificate, beyond the petitioner's control, should not render the petitioner ineligible for appointment, especially when vacancies exist and there is a need for mo....
State is meant to be a model employer and must give due importance to the fundamental rights of equality and opportunity in matter of public appointment guaranteed under Article 14 and 16 of Constitu....
The eligibility for selection in recruitment processes must be determined as of the last date for application, and extensions cannot be granted based on sympathy.
The eligibility of candidates for selection must be assessed as of the specified cut-off date, and compliance with notification requirements is mandatory.
The importance of obtaining permission from the parent department and the relevance of appointment tenure in considering candidature for appointment.
Once a candidate is allowed to participate in a selection process, they cannot be denied appointment on the basis of an expired registration, particularly under exceptional circumstances like a pande....
Eligibility for public employment is determined strictly as of the cut-off date specified in recruitment notifications, and late fulfillments do not confer a right to be considered.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.