Back
INDRAJIT MAHANTY, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Pulak Saha – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in public interest by a practicing advocate of this court who is also engaged in social services activities. Petitioner has sought to project in-action and negligence on the part of doctors and hospital administration which according to him, led to the unfortunate premature death of a young promising lawyer who was the sole source of financial and emotional support for his widowed mother. Prayers made in this PIL include those for conducting a detailed enquiry into the allegations of medical negligence, formation of a special investigation team for investigating into a complaint of commission of offence under section 304 Part II read with section 34 IPC and for payment of compensation of Rs. 50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs) to the mother of the deceased.
2. After the death was reported to police, an FIR was registered for commission of offence punishable under section 304 Part II IPC with the intervention of the Superintendent of Police, West Tripura, Agartala. The police had completed the investigation and submitted the charge sheet on 15.10.2020 for commission of offence pu
The State and its medical facilities must ensure timely and adequate care; failure constitutes gross medical negligence resulting in liability for compensation.
Medical negligence—Death of a young promising Lawyer— in such a case for choosing multiplier, age of deceased and not that of mother would have to be taken into consideration Compensation of Rs.10,00....
The obligation of the State to provide adequate medical services to the people, as established in Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union of India and Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal,....
Medical negligence accusations must be substantiated by clear evidence; mere allegations, without expert consensus on negligence, are insufficient for criminal liability.
The right to health is integral to the right to life under Article 21, necessitating timely and adequate medical care, which was grossly violated in the case of the deceased, leading to her avoidable....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of expert medical opinion in cases of alleged medical negligence and the need for a high degree of negligence to establish criminal....
A negative final report does not bar further investigation and prosecution in cases of medical negligence requires substantial expert evidence.
Criminal negligence in medical cases requires a higher degree of care and thorough examination of facts by the magistrate to substantiate claims; an independent medical opinion is essential.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
