SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 401

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Divisional Manager, Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Taslima Khatun – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K. De, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. -Heard Mr. K De, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-insurance company.

2. This is an appeal filed under Section-173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 read with Section-168 of the Act ibid against the impugned judgment and award dated 29.07.2021 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sepahijala District, Sonamura in case No. T.S. (MAC) 12 of 2019.

3. The facts, in brief, are that on 14.09.2018 at noon about 1700/1430 hours while the deceased Abdul Karim along with his wife Tashlima Khatun i.e. the respondent No. 1 herein, were proceeding towards their house from Sonamura by riding a motor bike bearing registration No. TR01-S-8505 with normal speed left side of Sonamura-Boxanagar road and his wife Taslima Khatun was carrying 16 weeks pregnant. When they reached at N.C. Nagar near the house of one Latif Miah, suddenly one Bus bearing registration No. TR07-1236 was rashly and negligently dashed the said motor bike. As a result, the rider and pillion rider, namely, Abdul Karim and Taslima Khatun received grievous injuries and the said motor bike was damaged.

4. Subsequently, the local people shifted both the injured persons to Sonamura Su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top