SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 401

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Divisional Manager, Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Taslima Khatun – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K. De, Advocate, for the Appellant

Table of Content
1. details of the accident and injuries sustained. (Para 3 , 4)
2. challenge to the proof of income of the deceased. (Para 6 , 10)
3. affirmation of the tribunal's award and basis of income. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. reasoning on determining the notional income. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
5. final decision to dismiss the appeal. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. -Heard Mr. K De, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-insurance company.

2. This is an appeal filed under Section-173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 read with Section-168 of the Act ibid against the impugned judgment and award dated 29.07.2021 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sepahijala District, Sonamura in case No. T.S. (MAC) 12 of 2019.

3. The facts, in brief, are that on 14.09.2018 at noon about 1700/1430 hours while the deceased Abdul Karim along with his wife Tashlima Khatun i.e. the respondent No. 1 herein, were proceeding towards their house from Sonamura by riding a motor bike bearing registration No. TR01-S-8505 with normal speed left side of Sonamura-Boxanagar road and his wife Taslima Khatun was carrying 16 weeks pregnant. When they reached at N.C. Nagar near the house of one Latif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top