Back
T. AMARNATH GOUD
Babul Kumar Saha – Appellant
Versus
Lipika Dey – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. maintenance awarded in previous proceedings (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments against the existence of marriage and entitlement (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's refusal to reconsider factual position (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. disposal of petition with specified directions (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This instant criminal revision petition has been filed under Section 301 read with Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for setting aside/quashing the impugned order dated 13.01.2022 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Udaipur, Gomati Tripura in connection with Case No. Criminal Misc. (Ex) 25/2020 (arising out of Criminal Revision 64/2018) and (arising out of Criminal Revision Petition No. 73/2019 of the Hon'ble High Court of Tripura, Agartala) directing the opposite party-husband-respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 2,500/-(Rupees Two Thousand Five hundred) only per month to the present wife-respondent herein as monthly maintenance allowance w.e.f. 01.02.2020 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Tripura in connection with Case No. Criminal Revision Petition No. 73/2019.
2. Heard Mr. I. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Ms. R.
Court upheld the Family Court's order for maintenance, asserting that relationship status cannot be reassessed during execution proceedings while allowing the petitioner to reclaim if identity fraud ....
Modification of maintenance orders requires substantial evidence of changes in financial circumstances, with the burden of proof on the petitioner.
Maintenance orders require a proper reasoned basis that justifies the award, particularly in relation to the parties' financial circumstances.
three children are under the custody of their mother/ petitioner. Since the petitioner is a guardian of their children she has to maintain the education and marriage of the children etc. Further, the....
A valid marriage is crucial for maintenance claims; suppression of previous marriage impacts entitlement, underpinning the obligation to support under the law.
The court emphasized the financial capacity of the husband and the settled position of law regarding the commencement date of maintenance payments.
The court ruled that maintenance must reflect the full financial capacity of the respondent, ensuring adequate support for the petitioner and minor child, and should be awarded from the date of filin....
In maintenance proceedings, evidence must be evaluated in the broader context of survival, with emphasis on the obligation of the husband to provide for his wife and children, regardless of technical....
The court upheld the maintenance order based on the financial circumstances of the parties and the provisions of section 125 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent destitution.
: FIXATION OF MONTHLY MAINTENANCE - First respondent as well as the revision petitioner are financially sound- Educational expenses of the respondents 2 and 3, status of the parties and the present e....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
