SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 323

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Seema Pareek – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Pareek – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Hardik Gautam.
For the Respondent: Ms. Ranjeeta Kawadia.

JUDGMENT :

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.

1. This Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. and under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:

    "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this revision petition filed by the petitioners may kindly be allowed:

i. The impugned order dated 31.01.2020 passed by the Learned Family Court, Rajsamand (Raj.) in Criminal Case No. 22/2018 (Smt. Seema Pareekh & ors. v. Shri Gopal Pareekh) may kindly be quashed and set-aside.

ii. The monthly maintenance of Rs. 11,000/- (Rupees Eleven Thousand) may kindly be enhanced to Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand).

iii. The monthly maintenance may kindly be ordered from the date of filing of the application (i.e. 23.03.2018)."

2. As revealed from the aforequoted prayer clauses, this Criminal Revision Petition assails the order dated 31.01.2020, passed by the learned Family Court, Rajasamand in Smt. Seema Pareekh & Ors. v. Shri Gopal Pareekh, Case No. 22/2018, while seeking enhancement of the maintenance amount of Rs. 11,000/-, as granted to the revisionist-petitioners (wife, son and daughter, respectively, of the responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top