Back
T. AMARNATH GOUD, ARINDAM LODH
Kishore Jhara – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
JUDGMENT
T. Amarnath Goud, J. - Heard Mr. N. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the convict-appellant. Also heard Mr. R. Datta, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Tripura-respondent.
2. This criminal appeal has been filed under Section-374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 23.07.2015 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Khowai, West Tripura in connection with Sessions Trial No. 10 (T-1) of 2014 whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted under Section-302 of IPC and thereby sentenced to suffer RI for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/- for the same offence with default stipulation.
3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that The fact of the prosecution case is that on 24.3.2013 at about 6/6.30 p.m. the informant Maniklal Jhara got an information over mobile that his sister Gunamani Jhara was killed by her husband Kishore Jhara who by giving blows of sharp edged dao then fled away. After receiving the said information then and then he rushed to the house of the accused and found dead body of his sister lying in the north eastern side of the courtyard of the house with injuries on her hand
Court affirmed the conviction for murder based on the credible testimony of a sole eyewitness, emphasizing that absence of motive does not negate established guilt.
Conviction can be upheld based on the reliable testimony of a sole eyewitness, irrespective of the presence of corroborating evidence or independent witnesses, as long as the evidence is credible.
The importance of credible eyewitness testimony, reliable and clinching evidence, and the exclusion of every possible hypothesis except guilt in establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
A conviction for murder requires reliable and corroborated evidence, particularly when based on the testimony of a sole eyewitness; contradictions and lack of corroboration can lead to the reversal o....
The court established that the reliability of eyewitness testimony is crucial for a conviction, and the absence of corroborative evidence, along with significant contradictions in the testimony, can ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
