SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 142

T. AMARNATH GOUD
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Malek Miah – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Debnath, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S. Datta, Mr. H. Debbarma, Advocates, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal filed under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 against the impugned judgment and award dated 18.09.2021 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, West Tripura, Agartala, in Case No.TS.(MAC) No.254 of 2016 and staying of the operation of the impugned judgment and award dated 18.09.2021. Further not to proceed with any execution proceeding if any filed by the claimant respondents in the meantime, till disposal of the present appeal.

2. The fact of the case, in brief, is that, on 25.02.2015 the victim Sahara Khatun alias Sayera Begum as a gratuitous passenger went to Indranagar, Agartala boarding vehicle bearing No.TR-01-AQ-0228(Maruti Alto 800) for participating in a religious function of the Muslim Community. On the way back home, when the vehicle reached Ranirbazar, Nalgaria, on Assam-Agartala Road, at about 0.15 hrs of 26.02.2015, while giving pass to another vehicle dashed against a tree on the left side. As a result, Sahara Khatun alias Sayera Begum and the passengers in the said vehicle sustained serious injuries. With the help of the local people and fire service, they were taken to Ranirbazar PHC, wherefrom they were re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top