SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 733

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
AMTULS PUBLIC SCHOOL, NAINITAL – Appellant
Versus
KAMLA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Mr. Neeraj Upreti, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Bindesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Since common question of law and facts arises in all the three appeals, they are being decided by this common judgment.

2. Appeal From Order No.88 of 2008 has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 05.12.2007, passed in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.64 of 2007, Smt. Kamla Devi and others Vs. Amtuls Public School and another, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Nainital. By the impugned judgment and award, the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, “the Act") has been allowed and respondent no. 5, insurance company has been directed pay a compensation of Rs. 5,32,000/- to the respondent nos.1 to 4 (the claimants). The respondent no.5, insurance company has also been given the rights to recover this amount from the appellant.

3. In appeal From Order No.89 of 2008, challenge is made to the judgment and award dated 05.12.2007, passed in passed in Motor Accidents Claim Petition No. 63 of 2007, Smt. Govindi Devi and others Vs. Amtuls Public School and another, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Nainital. By the impugned judgment and award, the clai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top