Back
Next 
2023 Supreme(Tri) 22
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
T. Amarnath Goud, J.
Matilal Saha - Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate And Collector & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 1075 of 2022
Decided On : 27-01-2023
Important Points
Timely submission of pleadings in court is essential for procedural fairness and efficient case management.
Subject
Administrative Law - Writ Jurisdiction
Headnote
(A) Constitutional Law - High Court Rules - Writ Jurisdiction - Application for counter affidavit - The learned Additional Government Advocate sought additional time to file the Counter Affidavit from the court. (Para 1)
(B) Judicial Procedure - Scheduling - The court granted the request and set the next hearing date, displaying procedural efficiency in managing court schedules. (Para 2)
Facts of the case:
The appellant filed a writ petition against the District Magistrate and Collector, seeking remedies under Article 226 of the Constitution. A counsel for the respondents requested additional time to submit a counter affidavit.
Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the request and agreed to list the matter for next hearing while ensuring no undue delay in proceedings.
Issues: The primary issue was the timely filing of the counter affidavit by the respondents.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that both sides are afforded the opportunity to present their arguments adequately, thus prioritizing procedural fairness.
Result: The case was scheduled for a next hearing on 03.02.2023.
(B) Judicial Procedure - Scheduling - The court granted the request and set the next hearing date, displaying procedural efficiency in managing court schedules. (Para 2)
Facts of the case:
The appellant filed a writ petition against the District Magistrate and Collector, seeking remedies under Article 226 of the Constitution. A counsel for the respondents requested additional time to submit a counter affidavit.
Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the request and agreed to list the matter for next hearing while ensuring no undue delay in proceedings.
Issues: The primary issue was the timely filing of the counter affidavit by the respondents.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that both sides are afforded the opportunity to present their arguments adequately, thus prioritizing procedural fairness.
Result: The case was scheduled for a next hearing on 03.02.2023.
Advocates appeared:
A Sengupta, Advocate
A Sengupta, Advocate
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial proceedings for a counter affidavit. (Para 1) |
| 2. granting time for filing response. (Para 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT
T. Amarnath Goud, J. - Mr. D. Sharma, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Karnajit De, learned Additional Government Advocate who usually enters appearance on behalf of the respondents, seeks a week's time to file Counter Affidavit in this matter.
2. Request considered.
3. List this matter on 03.02.2023.
