SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Tri) 18

BISWAJIT PALIT
Santanu Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Shila Rani Ghosh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Mr. S. Ghosh, Addl. P.P., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER

Biswajit Palit, J. - Both the revision petitions are of common interest as such both the cases, taken up together for hearing and decision. Accordingly, by a common judgment both the revision petitions are disposed of.

2. Heard Mr. S. Lodh, Learned Counsel for the petitioner in connection with Crl. Rev. P. No.61 of 2023 and also heard Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Learned Counsel for the respondent-wife. Also heard Learned Addl. P.P., Mr. S. Ghosh for the State. Similarly, in the connected case Crl. Rev. P. No.8 of 2024, heard Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Learned Counsel for the petitioner-wife, Mr. S. Lodh, Learned Counsel for the respondent-husband.

3. Before conclusion of the case, let us discuss about the subject matter of the dispute amongst the rival parties for which both the revision petitions are filed before the High Court.

The petitioner-wife Shila Rani Ghosh for herself and also on behalf of the minor son Master Anuj Ghosh filed one application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for granting of monthly maintenance allowance to the petitioner and the minor son at the rate of Rs.15,000/-(fifteen thousand) per month against her husband.

4. The gist of the petition fil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top