IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AT AGARTALA
Biswajit Palit
Subrata Nath, S/o. Late Shiv Nath – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Biswajit Palit, J.
This criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C.challenging the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 04.01.2024 delivered by Learned Sessions Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar in connection with case No.S.T.(T-1) No.22 of 2019. By the said judgment, the appellant has been convicted under Section 323 of IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for 6(six) months and also to pay fine of Rs.1000/- i.d. to suffer imprisonment for a further period of 1(one) month.
2. Heard Learned Senior Counsel Mr. P. K. Biswas assisted by Learned Counsel Mr. P. Majumder, Learned Counsel Mr. Rishiraj Nath and Learned Counsel Ms. S. Debbarma for the appellant and also heard Learned P.P. Mr.Raju Datta representing the State of Tripura.
3. In course of hearing, Learned Senior Counsel drawn the attention of the Court that initially the charge was framed by the Learned Trial Court under Section 307 of IPC but on conclusion of trial, Learned Trial Court below has found the appellant to be guilty under Section 323 of IPC and sentenced him accordingly. According to Learned Counsel, in this case the prosecution has failed to explain the actual PO before the Learned Tr
Syed Ibrahim v. State of Andhra Pradesh
State of Haryana v. Inderaj and another
The conviction under Section 323 IPC was overturned due to discrepancies in witness testimonies and insufficient evidence supporting the prosecution's claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond all reasonable doubts, emphasizing the importance of trustworthy evide....
Lengthy cross-examination of a witness may invariably result in contradictions – But these contradictions are not always sufficient to discredit a witness.
Conviction under Section 302 cannot rest on sole eyewitness testimony riddled with contradictions, delay in naming accused, medical inconsistencies, and unnatural conduct; prosecution must prove guil....
Eyewitness testimony holds credibility even when minor contradictions exist; motive for crime established through related witness accounts legitimizes conviction under Section 302 IPC.
The court upheld convictions for murder against the appellants, affirming that eyewitness testimony, supported by corroborative evidence, was reliable, and distinctions made in witnesses did not affe....
The appellate court may reverse an acquittal if it determines the trial court's findings are perverse and unsupported by credible evidence, reaffirming the reliance on direct eyewitness testimony.
Mere failure of the prosecution in producing reports from the Forensic Science Laboratory relating to the weapon of offence and the blood-stained earth and clothes would not derogate from the veracit....
The judgment establishes that minor discrepancies in witness testimonies, which do not materially affect the case, cannot be the basis for doubting the prosecution's case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the testimony of witnesses, even if related to the deceased, should not be automatically discarded, and minor discrepancies in the evidence sh....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.