MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, H.S.THANGKHIEW
Small Phawa – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, J.
1. Appellant, vide judgment impugned dated 27.09.2016 has been convicted for having committed an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC. After hearing the prosecution and accused regarding quantum of sentence on the same date i.e. 27.09.2016 has been sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.5000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo one year simple imprisonment. Furthermore, the District Legal Service Authority of West Jaintia Hills District has been directed to pay compensation of Rs.1 lakh to the victim under the Meghalaya Victim Compensation Scheme, 2014. Aggrieved whereof, instant appeal registered as Criminal Appeal No.5 of 2016 has been filed.
2. Heard Mr. SP Mahanta, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. A Thungwa, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. S Sen Gupta, learned Addl.PP.
3. The mother of the victim on 02.12.2011 lodged a written report in Jowai P.S., Jowai against the accused (appellant) alleging therein that on 30.11.2011 at 6:30 PM, her daughter 14 years of age studying in Class-III accompanied her brother who had to go to the toilet located outside the residential house. Grandparents of the victim we
J. Jayalalithaa and Ors Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors
Natasha Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
State of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh
Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh and Anr Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.