SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Megh) 43

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
T. Nandakumar Singh, J.
HAV/CIPH Abdul Bari (S/356033w) - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India And Others - Respondent
Writ Petition (C) No. 256 (SH) of 2012
Decided on : 10-04-2013

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : N. Khan
For the Respondent: S.C. Shyam CGC

Headnote:

Financial Upgradation - Service Matter - ACP Scheme - Para 3.1 of the Office Memorandum dated August, 1999 - Para 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.1 and 5.2 of the Annexure-II - Re-musteration to Cipher Trade i.e. Havildar/Cipher is not a promotion and not a financial up-gradation - Judgment of the CAT in Sentimon Mathew vs. Union of India - Judgment of the Kerala High Court (Division Bench) - Internal communication and the office note cannot be the order issued by the competent authority - settled principle as to how the judgment and order is to be read

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Havildar/Cipher, sought financial up-gradation under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) and the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme. The dispute arose from the interpretation of the ACP Scheme and whether re-musteration to Cipher Trade i.e. Havildar/Cipher constituted a promotion or financial up-gradation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that re-musteration to Cipher Trade i.e. Havildar/Cipher was not a promotion or financial up-gradation under the ACP Scheme. The judgment of the CAT in Sentimon Mathew vs. Union of India and the Kerala High Court (Division Bench) supported this finding.

Issues: The main issues were whether re-musteration to Cipher Trade i.e. Havildar/Cipher constituted a promotion or financial up-gradation under the ACP Scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that re-musteration to Cipher Trade i.e. Havildar/Cipher did not constitute a promotion or financial up-gradation under the ACP Scheme, based on the judgments of the CAT and the Kerala High Court.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to grant the 2nd financial up-gradation under the MACPS on the completion of 20 years in service as Havildar/Cipher w.e.f. 20.11.2011 and the 1st financial up-gradation should be from 20.11.2003 with consequential benefits. The impugned order dated 12.07.2012 was quashed and the impugned order dated 07.10.2009 was modified to the extent that the 1st financial up-gradation should be w.e.f. 20.11.2003.

JUDGMENT :

T. Nandakumar Singh, J.

1. Heard Mr. N Khan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. SC Shyam, learned CGC appearing for the respondents No. 1-6. The petitioner has been serving as Havildar/Cipher from 20.11.1991. In this writ petition, he prays for a direction to the respondents to grant him the 2nd financial up-gradation by counting his continuous service as Havildar/Cipher from 20.11.1991 under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (for short "MACPS") dated 18.09.2009 and also for a direction to the respondents to grant the first ACP to the petitioner w.e.f. 20.11.2003 and also for quashing the impugned order dated 07.10.2009 for granting the First financial benefits w.e.f. 03.11.2007 and also the impugned letter dated 12.07.2012 that the musteration is a method of appointment in RRs and it would be counted as up-gradation for the purpose of MACPS and the 1st ACP granted to the petitioner w.e.f. 03.11.2007 will be treated as 2nd financial up-gradation and as for granting of 3rd financial up-gradation to the petitioner, it will be considered and granted on completion of 30 years qualifying service and other conditions as required.

2. Factual backgrounds:--

    The petitioner was enrolled in Assam Rifles on 27.11.1986 as Rifleman/ORL (Operator Radio and Line) and had undergone basic training of 6(six) months at Assam Rifles Training Centre, Diphu, Assam. The petitioner had also undergone technical training for further period of 6(six) months for ORL trade. After completion of the basic training and technical training, the petitioner started serving as Rifleman/ORL in Assam Rifles. The petitioner after completing unblemished service of four years as Rifleman/ORL, in response to the Notification of the Department that the Personnel serving as Rifleman/ORL, who had rendered three years of service are eligible to appear in exam for the purpose of changing their trade to Cipher Trade, had volunteered to change his trade and appeared before the Board convened for the said purpose in the year 1989. The petitioner was selected by the Board. Accordingly, he was appointed as Havildar/Cipher on 20.11.1991 through the process of conversion/re-musteration. The Havildar/Cipher is the lowest rank in the Cipher Trade. There is no promotion to the Havildar/Cipher from the lower ranka, like Rifleman and Naik and there is also no direct recruitment from the fresh to the Havildar/Cipher. The appointment as Havildar/Cipher which is the lowest rank in the trade is only through conversion/re-musteration from the other trades. The petitioner while serving as Rifleman/ORL was eligible for promotion to the post of Naik/ORL but the petitioner in the process of remusteration had been categorized as Havildar/Cipher. Since 20.11.1991, the petitioner has been working as Havildar/Cipher continuously without any break and promotion till date. The 5th Pay Commission recommended for financial up- gradation to all the Central Govt. employees i.e. ACP-I and ACP-II on completion of 12 and 24 years respectively in the category in which they were appointed subject to qualification for promotion to the rank/pay scale to which ACP is granted and the Scheme i.e. Assured Career Progression (for short "ACP") was made effective w.e.f. 09.08.1999 vide Office Memorandum F. No. 35034/1/97-Estt.(D (Vol. IV), Govt. of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) North Block, New Delhi-1100001, February, 2000. In para 2 of the said Memorandum, it is stated that the ACP Scheme should strictly be implemented in keeping with the Department of Personnel and Training Office Memorandum dated August, 1999 and also it has been stated in the Office Memorandum dated August, 1999 a doubt raised by various quarters have been duly examined point-wise and clarifications have already been indicated in the Annexures.

3. Para 3.1 of the Office Memorandum dated August, 1999 reads as follows:--

    POSTS IN GROUP 'A', 'B'

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top